This HTML5 document contains 51 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n4http://portal.nasstar.com/75/files/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Prince_of_Wales_v_Associated_Newspapers_Ltd
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd
rdfs:comment
His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2006] EWHC 11 (Ch) is an English legal case brought about when The Mail on Sunday published extracts of a dispatch by Charles, Prince of Wales, the heir to the British throne.
dbp:name
His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd
dcterms:subject
dbc:2006_in_case_law dbc:2006_in_British_law dbc:English_privacy_case_law dbc:Charles_III dbc:High_Court_of_Justice_cases dbc:Daily_Mail_and_General_Trust dbc:Diaries
dbo:wikiPageID
23536405
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1109531915
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Hong_Kong dbr:The_Mail_on_Sunday dbr:Transfer_of_sovereignty_of_Hong_Kong dbc:Charles_III dbc:2006_in_British_law dbc:2006_in_case_law dbr:Summary_judgment dbr:David_Kitchin dbc:English_privacy_case_law dbr:High_Court_of_Justice dbr:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales) dbc:Daily_Mail_and_General_Trust dbc:Diaries dbc:High_Court_of_Justice_cases dbr:Charles,_Prince_of_Wales dbr:Hong_Kong_handover_ceremony dbr:Privacy_in_English_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:HRH%20Prince%20of%20Wales-v-Associated%20Newspapers%20Ltd%20ChD%2013%20Jan%202006.pdf
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.06wbqpc wikidata:Q5772186 n16:4mdVA
dbp:transcripts
n4:HRH%20Prince%20of%20Wales-v-Associated%20Newspapers%20Ltd%20ChD%2013%20Jan%202006.pdf
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Charles,_Prince_of_Wales dbt:UK-law-stub dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Reflist
dbp:citations
[2006] EWHC 11
dbp:court
dbr:High_Court_of_Justice
dbp:fullName
His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Limited
dbp:judges
dbr:David_Kitchin
dbp:keywords
Privacy
dbo:abstract
His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2006] EWHC 11 (Ch) is an English legal case brought about when The Mail on Sunday published extracts of a dispatch by Charles, Prince of Wales, the heir to the British throne. The extracts published in November 2005 from the dispatch; titled "The handover of Hong Kong or the Great Chinese Takeaway", were personally embarrassing to the Prince. The dispatch had been written on the flight back from Hong Kong to the United Kingdom from the transfer of sovereignty of Hong Kong to China, and had been handed out to friends. The Prince described the 1997 Hong Kong handover ceremony as an "awful Soviet-style" performance and "ridiculous rigmarole" and the likened Chinese officials to "appalling old waxworks". The extracts were one of eight reports written following overseas tours in the 1990s that were leaked to the newspaper by Sarah Goodall, a former secretary in the prince's household from 1988 to 2000. The journals were written by Charles following foreign visits and over the course of 30 years. They had been shared "in confidence" with between 50 and 75 people.
dbp:dateDecided
2006-01-13
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Prince_of_Wales_v_Associated_Newspapers_Ltd?oldid=1109531915&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4212
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Prince_of_Wales_v_Associated_Newspapers_Ltd