This HTML5 document contains 84 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n19https://web.archive.org/web/20120226203714/http:/scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc28/
n18https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
dbpedia-frhttp://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:R_v_JA
rdf:type
yago:WikicatSexCrimesInCanada yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Wrongdoing100732746 yago:Event100029378 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Activity100407535 yago:Transgression100745005 yago:Act100030358 yago:StatutoryOffense100774796 yago:Crime100766234 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:SexualAssault100774107 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
rdfs:label
R. c. J.A. R v JA
rdfs:comment
R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding consent in cases of sexual assaults. The court found that a person can only consent to sexual activity if they are conscious throughout that activity. If a person becomes unconscious during the sexual activity, then they legally cannot consent, whether or not they consented earlier. In addition to the two parties (J.A. and the Attorney General of Ontario), the Court heard from two interveners: the Attorney General of Canada and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF). R. c. J.A. est un arrêt de principe de 2011 de la Cour suprême du Canada concernant le consentement dans les affaires d'agression sexuelle et notamment lorsque la victime devient inconsciente.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Canadian_criminal_case_law dbc:2011_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbc:Sex_crimes_in_Canada
dbo:wikiPageID
31908111
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1104654838
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Epilepsy dbr:University_of_Toronto dbr:University_of_Ottawa dbr:Assault dbc:Canadian_criminal_case_law dbr:Attorney_General_of_Canada dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Attorney_General_of_Ontario dbr:Rosie_DiManno dbr:Criminal_Code_(Canada) dbr:Spouse dbr:Morris_Fish dbr:Unconsciousness dbr:R_v_Ewanchuk dbr:Parliament_of_Canada dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Alcohol_intoxication dbc:2011_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:Court_of_Appeal_for_Ontario dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Toronto_Star dbr:Police dbr:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms dbr:Beverley_McLachlin dbr:R_v_Jobidon dbr:Sexual_assault dbr:Women's_Legal_Education_and_Action_Fund dbr:Erotic_asphyxiation dbr:Consent_(criminal_law) dbc:Sex_crimes_in_Canada dbr:Probation dbr:Criminal_law_of_Canada
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n19:2011scc28.html
owl:sameAs
yago-res:R_v_JA dbpedia-fr:R._c._J.A. freebase:m.0gvrv67 wikidata:Q7274240 n18:4u1xT
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Short_description dbt:Cite_CanLII
dbp:dissent
Fish
dbp:docket
33684
dbp:joindissent
Binnie and LeBel
dbp:joinmajority
Deschamps, Abella, Charron, Rothstein, and Cromwell
dbp:citations
2011
dbp:history
Judgment for the defendant in the Court of Appeal for Ontario
dbp:majority
McLachlin
dbp:ratio
A person can only legally consent to sexual activity if they have an operating mind during the sexual activity in question. Therefore, performing sexual activity on an unconscious person is a criminal offence – whether or not the unconscious person consented in advance.
dbo:abstract
R. c. J.A. est un arrêt de principe de 2011 de la Cour suprême du Canada concernant le consentement dans les affaires d'agression sexuelle et notamment lorsque la victime devient inconsciente. R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding consent in cases of sexual assaults. The court found that a person can only consent to sexual activity if they are conscious throughout that activity. If a person becomes unconscious during the sexual activity, then they legally cannot consent, whether or not they consented earlier. In addition to the two parties (J.A. and the Attorney General of Ontario), the Court heard from two interveners: the Attorney General of Canada and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).
dbp:caseName
R v JA
dbp:decidedDate
2011-05-27
dbp:fullCaseName
Her Majesty The Queen v JA
dbp:heardDate
2010-11-08
dbp:ruling
Appeal allowed and conviction entered
dbp:scc
2008
gold:hypernym
dbr:Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:R_v_JA?oldid=1104654838&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
9327
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:R_v_JA