This HTML5 document contains 74 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n11https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n8http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
n18http://www.hrcr.org/safrica/arrested_rights/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:R_v_Waterfield
rdf:type
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Happening107283608 dbo:Place yago:Event100029378 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label
R v Waterfield
rdfs:comment
R v Waterfield [1963] 3 All E.R. 659 is an English Court of Appeal decision, a court of binding precedent, outlining the modern limits of the law that authorises a police officer to stop (and then conceivably detain) a person. This case produced what is known as the Waterfield test (incorporating the common law "ancillary power doctrine") for the limit of police authority to interfere with a person's liberty or property.
dbp:name
R v. Waterfield
foaf:depiction
n8:Polis.png
dcterms:subject
dbc:1963_in_British_law dbc:1963_in_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbc:English_criminal_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
3236082
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1082980722
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:In_flagrante_delicto dbr:Offences_against_the_Person_Act_1861 dbc:1963_in_case_law dbr:Road_Traffic_Act_1960 dbr:Police_constable dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbr:Criminal_law dbr:Precedent dbr:Common_law dbr:Metropolitan_Police_Act_1839 dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbr:England dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Judicature_cases dbc:English_criminal_case_law dbr:English_criminal_law dbc:1963_in_British_law dbr:Case_citation
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n18:R_Waterfield.htm
owl:sameAs
n11:4u6tP wikidata:Q7278326 freebase:m.0909qh
dbp:subsequentActions
None
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Portal dbt:Unreferenced dbt:Notelist dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Efn dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Reflist dbt:Blockquote dbt:Abbreviation
dbo:thumbnail
n8:Polis.png?width=300
dbp:citations
[1964] 1 Q.B. 164; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 946; [1963] 3 All E.R. 659; 48 Cr. App. R. 42; 128 J.P. 48; 107 S.J. 833
dbp:court
Court of Appeal
dbp:fullName
The Crown v Eli Waterfield
dbp:judges
Lord Parker C.J., Ashworth J. and Hinchcliffe J.
dbp:keywords
Police officers Assault Police powers Search and seizure Action without warrant for minor suspected offences Vehicle Investigation of misdemeanours
dbo:abstract
R v Waterfield [1963] 3 All E.R. 659 is an English Court of Appeal decision, a court of binding precedent, outlining the modern limits of the law that authorises a police officer to stop (and then conceivably detain) a person. This case produced what is known as the Waterfield test (incorporating the common law "ancillary power doctrine") for the limit of police authority to interfere with a person's liberty or property.
dbp:casesCited
None
dbp:dateDecided
1963-10-17
dbp:legislationCited
Road Traffic Act 1960 s. 223 Road Traffic Act 1960 s. 2 Offences against the Person Act 1861 s. 38 Metropolitan Police Act 1839 s. 66
dbp:priorActions
None
gold:hypernym
dbr:Court
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:R_v_Waterfield?oldid=1082980722&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4493
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:R_v_Waterfield