This HTML5 document contains 50 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n11http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Smart_v_HM_Advocate
rdf:type
yago:Event100029378 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Case107308889 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Happening107283608
rdfs:label
Smart v HM Advocate
rdfs:comment
Smart v Her Majesty's Advocate is a Scots law case that effectively excludes the common law doctrine of Volenti non fit injuria from Scots criminal law, when concerning assault. The case saw the accused, William Smart, who was charged with assault, lodging the defence that his victim Issac Wilkie has consented to a "square go". Therefore Smart could not be charged with assaulting Wilkie or any injuries arising from the fight.
dbp:name
Smart v HM Advocate
foaf:depiction
n11:Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_(Scotland).svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:1975_in_case_law dbc:1975_in_Scotland dbc:High_Court_of_Justiciary_cases dbc:1975_in_British_law
dbo:wikiPageID
2312163
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1117144881
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:High_Court_of_Justiciary dbr:Lord_Justice_Clerk dbc:1975_in_case_law dbr:Her_Majesty's_Advocate dbr:Street_fighting dbr:Volenti_non_fit_injuria dbr:John_Wheatley,_Baron_Wheatley dbc:1975_in_Scotland dbr:Operation_Spanner dbr:Gerald_Gordon dbc:High_Court_of_Justiciary_cases dbr:Scots_Law_Times dbc:1975_in_British_law
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q16931849 n16:epfj freebase:m.072zz1
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Case-law-stub dbt:Tone dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Scotland-law-stub dbt:Use_dmy_dates
dbo:thumbnail
n11:Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_(Scotland).svg?width=300
dbp:citations
1975
dbp:court
dbr:High_Court_of_Justiciary
dbp:imagesize
150
dbp:judges
Lord Justice Clerk Lord Wheatley, Lord Leechman, Lord Thomson
dbo:abstract
Smart v Her Majesty's Advocate is a Scots law case that effectively excludes the common law doctrine of Volenti non fit injuria from Scots criminal law, when concerning assault. The case saw the accused, William Smart, who was charged with assault, lodging the defence that his victim Issac Wilkie has consented to a "square go". Therefore Smart could not be charged with assaulting Wilkie or any injuries arising from the fight.
dbp:dateDecided
1975-01-24
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Smart_v_HM_Advocate?oldid=1117144881&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3365
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Smart_v_HM_Advocate