This HTML5 document contains 80 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n17https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n11https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n14https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/592/19-71/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Tanzin_v._Tanvir
rdf:type
dbo:Case dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase owl:Thing dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:LegalCase
rdfs:label
Tanzin v. Tanvir
rdfs:comment
Tanzin v. Tanvir, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving legal remedies that could be sought by litigants against federal officials for violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. In a unanimous decision issued December 10, 2020, the court ruled that the Act allowed for litigants to seek not only injunctive relief but also monetary damages.
foaf:name
FNU Tanzin, et al. v. Muhammad Tanvir, et al.
dct:subject
dbc:Legal_issues_related_to_the_September_11_attacks dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_statutory_interpretation_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
66077060
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1100662731
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbr:2d_Cir. dbr:Transportation_Security_Administration dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:F.3d dbr:September_11_attacks dbc:Legal_issues_related_to_the_September_11_attacks dbr:Amy_Coney_Barrett dbr:S.D.N.Y. dbc:United_States_statutory_interpretation_case_law dbr:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act_of_1993 dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Qualified_immunity dbr:F.Supp. dbr:Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation dbc:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act dbr:No_Fly_List dbr:Muslim dbr:COVID-19_pandemic dbr:Mootness
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n17:19-71_qol1.pdf n14: n11:19-71
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q104880243 n15:FYyWL
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:US1stAmendment dbt:USGWOTlaw
dbp:docket
19
dbp:joinmajority
Roberts, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
dbp:oralargument
n11:19-71
dbp:oyez
n11:19-71
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
___
dbp:usvol
592
dbp:arguedate
0001-10-06
dbp:argueyear
2020
dbp:case
Tanzin v. Tanvir,
dbp:decidedate
0001-12-10
dbp:decideyear
2020
dbp:fullname
FNU Tanzin, et al. v. Muhammad Tanvir, et al.
dbp:holding
The express remedies provision under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 permits litigants to obtain monetary damages against federal officials in their individual capacity whenever it is appropriate for such litigants to do so. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.
dbp:justia
n14:
dbp:litigants
Tanzin v. Tanvir
dbp:majority
Thomas
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n17:19-71_qol1.pdf
dbo:abstract
Tanzin v. Tanvir, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving legal remedies that could be sought by litigants against federal officials for violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. In a unanimous decision issued December 10, 2020, the court ruled that the Act allowed for litigants to seek not only injunctive relief but also monetary damages.
dbp:notparticipating
Barrett
dbp:scotus
2020
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Tanzin_v._Tanvir?oldid=1100662731&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
9042
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Tanzin_v._Tanvir