This HTML5 document contains 126 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n20https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n8https://heinonline.org/HOL/P%3Fh=hein.journals/
n5https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/591/19-635/
n17https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/
n11https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
dbpedia-zhhttp://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n7https://web.archive.org/web/20201115213859/https:/edition.cnn.com/2020/07/29/politics/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-abortion-trump-documents/
n15https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/29/politics/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-abortion-trump-documents/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Trump_v._Vance
rdf:type
dbo:UnitOfWork owl:Thing wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase
rdfs:label
川普訴萬斯案 Trump v. Vance
rdfs:comment
川普诉万斯案(英語:Trump v. Vance),是美国联邦最高法院于2020年具有里程碑意义的一案,案涉及纽约县地方检察官调阅唐纳德·特朗普的税务记录作为对史多美·丹尼爾丑闻正在进行的调查的一部分,特朗普已提起诉讼以防止其被调阅。最高法院裁定,美国宪法第二条和至高條款并未明确排除或不要求提高向现任总统签发国家刑事传票的标准。法官于2020年7月发布了7–2的裁定。塞缪尔·阿利托和克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官持反对意见。 Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark US Supreme Court case arising from a subpoena issued in August 2019 by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. against Mazars, then-President Donald Trump's accounting firm, for Trump's tax records and related documents, as part of his ongoing investigation into the Stormy Daniels scandal. Trump commenced legal proceedings to prevent their release.
foaf:name
Donald J. Trump v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.
dcterms:subject
dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_executive_privilege_case_law dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Two_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:Supremacy_Clause_case_law dbc:United_States_tax_law dbc:Donald_Trump_litigation
dbo:wikiPageID
64504998
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1113750124
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_tax_law dbr:US_House_of_Representatives dbr:Younger_v._Harris dbr:Joan_Biskupic dbr:Democratic_Party_(United_States) dbr:Absolute_immunity dbr:Stormy_Daniels_scandal dbr:Subpoenas dbr:Cyrus_Vance_Jr. dbr:Separation_of_powers dbr:Neil_Gorsuch dbr:Victor_Marrero dbr:Clinton_v._Jones dbr:New_York_investigations_of_The_Trump_Organization dbr:Capital_One dbr:Hastings_Constitutional_Law_Quarterly dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Doe_et_al._v._Trump_Corp._et_al. dbr:Brett_Kavanaugh dbc:United_States_executive_privilege_case_law dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Two_case_law dbr:United_States_House_Committee_on_Ways_and_Means dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbr:United_States_House_Committee_on_Oversight_and_Reform dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:House_Committee_on_Oversight_and_Reform dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:John_Roberts dbr:Republican_Party_(United_States) dbr:Elena_Kagan dbr:Internal_Revenue_Service dbr:US_president dbr:Article_II_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Lawyers'_Edition dbc:Supremacy_Clause_case_law dbr:Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:COVID-19_pandemic dbr:US_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:Supremacy_Clause dbr:Trump_v._Mazars_USA,_LLP dbr:US_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:Mazars dbr:Donald_Trump dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:United_States_v._Nixon dbr:John_Marshall dbr:Deutsche_Bank dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:LexisNexis dbr:US_Supreme_Court dbr:Trump_administration dbr:Manhattan_District_Attorney dbr:Stormy_Daniels–Donald_Trump_scandal dbr:Samuel_Alito dbc:Donald_Trump_litigation dbr:US_Constitution dbr:Grand_jury dbr:CNN
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:index.html n8:hascq20&i=17 n11:19-635 n5: n15:index.html n17:19-635_o7jq.pdf
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q97274910 dbpedia-zh:川普訴萬斯案 n20:DHpuU
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Main dbt:Usc
dbp:dissent
Thomas Alito
dbp:docket
19
dbp:joinmajority
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Supremacy_Clause dbr:Article_II_of_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oyez
n11:19-635
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:uspage
___
dbp:usvol
591
dbp:arguedate
0001-05-12
dbp:argueyear
2020
dbp:decidedate
0001-07-09
dbp:decideyear
2020
dbp:fullname
Donald J. Trump v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.
dbp:holding
Article II and the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution do not categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president.
dbp:justia
n5:
dbp:litigants
Trump v. Vance
dbp:majority
Roberts
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n17:19-635_o7jq.pdf
dbo:abstract
Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark US Supreme Court case arising from a subpoena issued in August 2019 by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. against Mazars, then-President Donald Trump's accounting firm, for Trump's tax records and related documents, as part of his ongoing investigation into the Stormy Daniels scandal. Trump commenced legal proceedings to prevent their release. The Court held that Article II and the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution do not categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president. The 7–2 decision was issued in July 2020, with Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissenting. 川普诉万斯案(英語:Trump v. Vance),是美国联邦最高法院于2020年具有里程碑意义的一案,案涉及纽约县地方检察官调阅唐纳德·特朗普的税务记录作为对史多美·丹尼爾丑闻正在进行的调查的一部分,特朗普已提起诉讼以防止其被调阅。最高法院裁定,美国宪法第二条和至高條款并未明确排除或不要求提高向现任总统签发国家刑事传票的标准。法官于2020年7月发布了7–2的裁定。塞缪尔·阿利托和克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官持反对意见。
dbp:concurrence
Kavanaugh
dbp:joinconcurrence
Gorsuch
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Trump_v._Vance?oldid=1113750124&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
32761
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Trump_v._Vance