. . . . . . . . . "Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette,"@en . . . . . . "Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas"@en . . "O'Connor"@en . "515"^^ . . . "Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board, et al., Petitioners v. Vincent J. Pinette, Donnie A. Carr, and Knights of the Ku Klux Klan"@en . . . . . . . "25920.0"^^ . . . . "Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette"@en . "172800.0"^^ . . . . . . . . . "--06-29"^^ . . . . . "Stevens"@en . . "Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board, et al., Petitioners v. Vincent J. Pinette, Donnie A. Carr, and Knights of the Ku Klux Klan"@en . . . . "1995"^^ . . . . . . "753"^^ . . . . . "--04-26"^^ . "Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette"@en . "Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court case that focused on First Amendment rights and the Establishment Clause. Vincent Pinette, an active member of the Ku Klux Klan in Columbus, Ohio, wanted to place an unattended cross on the lawn of the Capitol Square during the 1993 Christmas season. Pinette and his fellow members of the KKK submitted their request. The advisory board originally denied this request. However, Pinette and the other members of the Ohio Chapter of the Klan fought this decision in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The court found in favor of the Klan and the Advisory Board issued the permit. The Board appealed to the United States Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decisio"@en . . "1995"^^ . . . "33442837"^^ . . "1061811217"^^ . . . "Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court case that focused on First Amendment rights and the Establishment Clause. Vincent Pinette, an active member of the Ku Klux Klan in Columbus, Ohio, wanted to place an unattended cross on the lawn of the Capitol Square during the 1993 Christmas season. Pinette and his fellow members of the KKK submitted their request. The advisory board originally denied this request. However, Pinette and the other members of the Ohio Chapter of the Klan fought this decision in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The court found in favor of the Klan and the Advisory Board issued the permit. The Board appealed to the United States Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decision of the district court. The board made one last petition to the Supreme Court where the decision was made, by a vote of seven to two, that the Klan was permitted to display the cross at the public forum."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Scalia"@en . "Religious expression does not violate the Establishment Clause when it is completely private and takes place in a designated public forum."@en . ""@en . . "Scalia"@en . "13970"^^ . "Ginsburg"@en . "Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer"@en . . "Souter, Breyer"@en . . . . "Thomas"@en . . . "O'Connor, Breyer"@en . . . "Souter"@en .