. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "1116099058"^^ . . . . . . . . . "60360839"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Censorship and media control during the Venezuelan presidential crisis"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "There has been censorship and media control during Venezuelan presidential crisis between 2019 and 2020. A crisis concerning who is the legitimate President of Venezuela began on 10 January 2019, when the opposition-majority National Assembly declared that incumbent Nicol\u00E1s Maduro's 2018 reelection was invalid and the body declared its president, Juan Guaid\u00F3, to be acting president of the nation. The process and results of the May 2018 Venezuelan presidential election were widely disputed. The National Assembly declared Maduro illegitimate on the day of his second inauguration, citing the 1999 Constitution of Venezuela enacted under Hugo Ch\u00E1vez, Maduro's predecessor; in response, the pro-Maduro Supreme Tribunal of Justice said the National Assembly's declaration was unconstitutional. Maduro's government states that the crisis is a \"coup d'\u00E9tat led by the United States to topple him and control the country's oil reserves\". Guaid\u00F3 denies the coup allegations, saying peaceful volunteers back his movement. Since the beginning of the presidential crisis, Venezuela has been exposed to frequent \"information blackouts\", periods without access to internet or other news services during important political events. Since January, the National Assembly and Guaido's speeches are regularly disrupted, television channels and radio programs have been censored and many journalists have been illegally detained. The Venezuelan press workers union reported that in 2019, 40 journalists had been illegally detained as of 12 March. As of June 2019, journalists have been denied access to seven sessions of the National Assembly by the National Guard. Most Venezuelan television channels are controlled by the state, and information unfavorable to the government is not covered completely. Newspapers and magazines are scarce, as most are unable to afford paper to print. The underfunded web infrastructure has led to slow Internet connection speeds. The information blackouts have promoted the creation of underground news coverage that is usually broadcast through social media and instant message services like WhatsApp. The dependence of Venezuelans on social media has also promoted the spread of disinformation and pro-Maduro propaganda. Venezuela got the rank 148 of 180 in the World Press Freedom Index of Reporters Without Borders in 2019. The country went down five places since 2018. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) has made a call to Maduro administration to reestablish television and radio channels that have been closed, cease on the restrictions to Internet access, and to protect the rights of journalists. In 2022, pro-government deputy admitted that the government blocked digital outlets."@en . . . . "93833"^^ . . . "There has been censorship and media control during Venezuelan presidential crisis between 2019 and 2020. A crisis concerning who is the legitimate President of Venezuela began on 10 January 2019, when the opposition-majority National Assembly declared that incumbent Nicol\u00E1s Maduro's 2018 reelection was invalid and the body declared its president, Juan Guaid\u00F3, to be acting president of the nation. The process and results of the May 2018 Venezuelan presidential election were widely disputed. The National Assembly declared Maduro illegitimate on the day of his second inauguration, citing the 1999 Constitution of Venezuela enacted under Hugo Ch\u00E1vez, Maduro's predecessor; in response, the pro-Maduro Supreme Tribunal of Justice said the National Assembly's declaration was unconstitutional."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .