. . . . . "Marriage is one of the \"basic civil rights of man,\" fundamental to our very existence and survival. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law."@en . "1114235814"^^ . . . . . . . . "Lovingovi vs. Virginie (anglicky: Loving v. Virginia), 388 U.S. 1, je p\u0159\u00EDpad Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00EDho soudu Spojen\u00FDch st\u00E1t\u016F americk\u00FDch z roku 1967, kter\u00FD zru\u0161il platnost z\u00E1kon\u016F zakazuj\u00EDc\u00EDch rasov\u011B sm\u00ED\u0161en\u00E1 man\u017Eelstv\u00ED. \u017Daluj\u00EDc\u00ED strana byli \u010Derno\u0161ka Mildred Dolores Loving (za svobodna Jeter) a b\u011Bloch Richard Perry Loving z Virginie. Ve Virginii, stejn\u011B jako v dal\u0161\u00EDch 16 st\u00E1tech USA, byl v platnosti z\u00E1kon striktn\u011B zakazuj\u00EDc\u00ED rasov\u011B sm\u00ED\u0161en\u00E1 man\u017Eelstv\u00ED."@cs . "Richard Perry Loving, Mildred Jeter Loving v. Virginia"@en . . . . . "Lovingovi vs. Virginie"@cs . . . . "Loving kontra\u016D Virginio"@eo . "Bans on interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution."@en . . . . "The State [of Virginia] finds support for its \"equal application\" theory in the decision of the Court in Pace v. Alabama. ... However, as recently as the 1964 Term, in rejecting the reasoning of that case, we stated \"Pace represents a limited view of the Equal Protection Clause which has not withstood analysis in the subsequent decisions of this Court.\""@en . . . . . . . . "El caso Loving contra Virginia, , fue un caso judicial sobre derechos civiles, llevado ante la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, que en la sentencia del mismo sent\u00F3 jurisprudencia invalidando las leyes que prohib\u00EDan el matrimonio interracial en los Estados Unidos."@es . . . . . . . "--06-12"^^ . "between citizens solely because of their ancestry\" as being \"odious to a free people whose institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality.\" At the very least, the Equal Protection Clause demands that racial classifications, especially suspect in criminal statutes, be subjected to the \"most rigid scrutiny.\""@en . . . . "347332"^^ . "\u041B\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043D\u0433 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0442\u0438\u0432 \u0412\u0438\u0440\u0433\u0438\u043D\u0438\u0438 388 U.S. 1 (1967) \u2014 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043A\u043E\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043E\u0432\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u0421\u0428\u0410, \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043D\u043E\u0432\u0438\u0432\u0448\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u043E\u0431\u043E\u0434\u0443 \u0441\u043C\u0435\u0448\u0430\u043D\u043D\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u043E\u0432. \u0420\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0431\u044B\u043B\u043E \u043F\u043E\u0434\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u043D\u043E \u0435\u0434\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043B\u0430\u0441\u043D\u043E \u0432\u0441\u0435\u043C\u0438 \u0447\u043B\u0435\u043D\u0430\u043C\u0438 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430."@ru . . "172800.0"^^ . "1"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\u30E9\u30F4\u30A3\u30F3\u30B0\u5BFE\u30F4\u30A1\u30FC\u30B8\u30CB\u30A2\u5DDE\u88C1\u5224\uFF08\u30E9\u30F4\u30A4\u30F3\u30B0\u305F\u3044\u30F4\u30A1\u30FC\u30B8\u30CB\u30A2\u3057\u3085\u3046\u3055\u3044\u3070\u3093\u3001\u82F1\u8A9E: Loving v. Virginia\u3001388 U.S. 1 (1967)\uFF09\u306F\u3001\u7570\u4EBA\u7A2E\u9593\u7D50\u5A5A\u306B\u3064\u3044\u3066\u30011967\u5E746\u670812\u65E5\u306B\u5408\u8846\u56FD\u6700\u9AD8\u88C1\u5224\u6240\u304C\u884C\u3063\u305F\u88C1\u5224\u3067\u3042\u308B\u3002\u516C\u6C11\u6A29\u306B\u95A2\u3057\u3066\u306E\u753B\u671F\u7684\u306A\u5224\u6C7A\u3067\u3042\u308A\u3001\u7570\u4EBA\u7A2E\u9593\u7D50\u5A5A\u3092\u7981\u3058\u308B\u6CD5\u5F8B\u3092\u7121\u52B9\u306B\u3059\u308B\u3082\u306E\u3067\u3042\u3063\u305F\u3002"@ja . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\uB7EC\uBE59 \uB300 \uBC84\uC9C0\uB2C8\uC544 \uC0AC\uAC74(Loving v. Virginia)\uC740 \uBBF8\uAD6D \uC5F0\uBC29\uB300\uBC95\uC6D0\uC758 \uC720\uBA85\uD55C \uD310\uB840\uC774\uB2E4. \uBC84\uC9C0\uB2C8\uC544\uC8FC\uB294 \uD751\uC778\uACFC \uBC31\uC778\uAC04 \uACB0\uD63C\uD558\uB294 \uAC83\uC744 \uAE08\uC9C0\uD558\uB294 \uBC95\uC774 \uC788\uC5C8\uB294\uB370 \uC5F0\uBC29\uB300\uBC95\uC6D0\uC740 \uC774\uBC95\uC744 \uC704\uD5CC\uD310\uACB0\uC744 \uB0B4\uB838\uB2E4. \uC778\uC885\uC5D0 \uB530\uB978 \uCC28\uBCC4\uC740 \uC704\uD5CC\uC758 \uC758\uC2EC\uC774 \uAC00\uB294 \uCC28\uBCC4(supect classification)\uC73C\uB85C \uC5C4\uACA9\uC2EC\uC0AC\uAC00 \uC801\uC6A9\uB41C\uB2E4\uACE0 \uD655\uB9BD\uD558\uC600\uB2E4."@ko . "Loving, 388 U.S. at 12 ."@en . . . . "Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), adalah putusan hak sipil yang dikeluarkan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat. Putusan ini membatalkan . Kasus ini diangkat oleh Mildred Loving, perempuan berkulit hitam, dan Richard Loving, laki-laki berkulit putih, yang dipenjara selama satu tahun di Virginia karena menikahi satu sama lain. Pernikahan mereka melanggar aturan di negara bagian tersebut, , yang melarang pernikahan antara orang \"putih\" dan orang \"\". Mahkamah Agung secara bulat memutuskan bahwa larangan ini tidak konstitusional, membatalkan (1883), dan mengakhiri segala hambatan hukum berdasarkan ras dalam ."@in . . . . . . . . "Loving v. Virginia"@en . "\uB7EC\uBE59 \uB300 \uBC84\uC9C0\uB2C8\uC544 \uC0AC\uAC74(Loving v. Virginia)\uC740 \uBBF8\uAD6D \uC5F0\uBC29\uB300\uBC95\uC6D0\uC758 \uC720\uBA85\uD55C \uD310\uB840\uC774\uB2E4. \uBC84\uC9C0\uB2C8\uC544\uC8FC\uB294 \uD751\uC778\uACFC \uBC31\uC778\uAC04 \uACB0\uD63C\uD558\uB294 \uAC83\uC744 \uAE08\uC9C0\uD558\uB294 \uBC95\uC774 \uC788\uC5C8\uB294\uB370 \uC5F0\uBC29\uB300\uBC95\uC6D0\uC740 \uC774\uBC95\uC744 \uC704\uD5CC\uD310\uACB0\uC744 \uB0B4\uB838\uB2E4. \uC778\uC885\uC5D0 \uB530\uB978 \uCC28\uBCC4\uC740 \uC704\uD5CC\uC758 \uC758\uC2EC\uC774 \uAC00\uB294 \uCC28\uBCC4(supect classification)\uC73C\uB85C \uC5C4\uACA9\uC2EC\uC0AC\uAC00 \uC801\uC6A9\uB41C\uB2E4\uACE0 \uD655\uB9BD\uD558\uC600\uB2E4."@ko . . . . . . . . . . . "\"[d]istinctions"@en . . . . . "There is patently no legitimate overriding purpose independent of invidious racial discrimination which justifies this classification. The fact that Virginia prohibits only interracial marriages involving white persons demonstrates that the racial classifications must stand on their own justification, as measures designed to maintain White Supremacy. We have consistently denied the constitutionality of measures which restrict the rights of citizens on account of race. There can be no doubt that restricting the freedom to marry solely because of racial classifications violates the central meaning of the Equal Protection Clause."@en . . . . . . "U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Va. Code \u00A7\u00A7 20\u201358, 20\u201359"@en . "388"^^ . . . "Loving contro Virginia (12 giugno 1967) fu un caso giudiziario civile durante il quale la Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti dichiar\u00F2 incostituzionale il Racial Integrity Act del 1924 e ribalt\u00F2 la sentenza Pace v. Alabama del 1883, ponendo fine alle restrizioni legali relative ai matrimoni interrazziali negli Stati Uniti."@it . . "\u064A\u064F\u0639\u062A\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0643\u0645 \u0641\u064A \u0642\u0636\u064A\u0629 \u0644\u0648\u0641\u064A\u0646\u063A \u0636\u062F \u0641\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0627 \u0631\u0642\u0645 388 \u0644\u0639\u0627\u0645 1967 \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631\u064B\u0627 \u062A\u0627\u0631\u064A\u062E\u064A\u064B\u0627 \u0644\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064A\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0631\u064A\u0643\u064A\u0629 \u0628\u0634\u0623\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0642\u0648\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062F\u0646\u064A\u0629\u060C \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0630\u064A \u0642\u0636\u062A \u0641\u064A\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0628\u0623\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0627\u0646\u064A\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062A\u064A \u062A\u062D\u0638\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0628\u064A\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u062A\u0646\u062A\u0647\u0643 \u0628\u0646\u0648\u062F \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0645\u0627\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u0633\u0627\u0648\u064A\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0625\u062C\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u062C\u0628\u0629 \u0641\u064A \u0627\u0644\u062A\u0639\u062F\u064A\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0628\u0639 \u0639\u0634\u0631 \u0644\u062F\u0633\u062A\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u062D\u062F\u0629. \u0627\u0628\u062A\u062F\u0627\u0621\u064B \u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0627\u0645 2013\u060C \u0627\u0633\u062A\u064F\u0634\u0647\u062F \u0628\u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0643\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0639\u062A\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0647 \u0633\u0627\u0628\u0642\u0629 \u0641\u064A \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0627\u0643\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u064A\u062F\u0631\u0627\u0644\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0631\u064A\u0643\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062A\u064A \u062A\u0646\u0635 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u062F\u0645 \u062F\u0633\u062A\u0648\u0631\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u064A\u0648\u062F \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0641\u0631\u0648\u0636\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062B\u0644\u064A\u064A\u0646 \u0641\u064A \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u062D\u062F\u0629\u060C \u0628\u0645\u0627 \u0641\u064A \u0630\u0644\u0643 \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064A\u0627 \u0644\u0639\u0627\u0645 2015 \u0641\u064A \u0642\u0636\u064A\u0629 \u0623\u0648\u0628\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0641\u064A\u0644 \u0636\u062F \u0647\u0648\u062F\u062C\u064A\u0632. \u0631\u064F\u0641\u0639\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0636\u064A\u0629 \u0628\u0634\u0623\u0646 \u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0645\u064A\u0644\u062F\u0631\u064A\u062F \u0644\u0648\u0641\u064A\u0646\u063A\u060C \u0648\u0647\u064A \u0627\u0645\u0631\u0623\u0629 \u0645\u0644\u0648\u0646\u0629\u060C \u0648\u0632\u0648\u062C\u0647\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0628\u064A\u0636 \u0631\u064A\u062A\u0634\u0627\u0631\u062F \u0644\u0648\u0641\u064A\u0646\u063A\u060C \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0630\u0627\u0646 \u0623\u064F\u062F\u064A\u0646\u0627 \u0648\u062D\u064F\u0643\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064A\u0647\u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0633\u062C\u0646 \u0645\u062F\u0629 \u0639\u0627\u0645 \u0641\u064A 1958. \u0627\u0646\u062A\u0647\u0643 \u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C\u0647\u0645\u0627 \u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0632\u0627\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0642\u064A\u0629 \u0641\u064A \u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0629 \u0641\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0627 \u0644\u0639\u0627\u0645 1924\u060C \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0630\u064A \u064A\u062C\u0631\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0628\u064A\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0634\u062E\u0627\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u0646\u0641\u064A\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0623\u0646\u0647\u0645 \u00AB\u0628\u064A\u0636\u00BB \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0634\u062E\u0627\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u0646\u0641\u064A\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0623\u0646\u0647\u0645 \u00AB\u0645\u0644\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0646\u00BB. \u0627\u0633\u062A\u0623\u0646\u0641\u062A \u0639\u0627\u0626\u0644\u0629 \u0644\u0648\u0641\u064A\u0646\u063A \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0625\u062F\u0627\u0646\u062A\u0647\u0645 \u0623\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064A\u0627 \u0641\u064A \u0641\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0627\u060C \u0627\u0644\u062A\u064A \u0623\u064A\u062F\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631. \u0642\u062F\u0645\u0627 \u0637\u0644\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062A\u0626\u0646\u0627\u0641 \u0628\u0639\u062F \u0630\u0644\u0643 \u0623\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064A\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0631\u064A\u0643\u064A\u0629\u060C \u0627\u0644\u062A\u064A \u0648\u0627\u0641\u0642\u062A \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062A\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u0642\u0636\u064A\u062A\u0647\u0645. \u0641\u064A \u064A\u0648\u0646\u064A\u0648 1967\u060C \u0623\u0635\u062F\u0631\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064A\u0627 \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631\u064B\u0627 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0625\u062C\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0644\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062D \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0648\u062C\u064A\u0646 \u0648\u0623\u0644\u063A\u062A \u062D\u0643\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u062F\u0627\u0646\u0629. \u0623\u0644\u063A\u0649 \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646 \u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0629 \u0641\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0627 \u0644\u0645\u0643\u0627\u0641\u062D\u0629 \u062A\u0645\u0627\u0632\u062C \u0627\u0644\u0623\u062C\u0646\u0627\u0633 \u0648\u0623\u0646\u0647\u0649 \u062C\u0645\u064A\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u064A\u0648\u062F \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0641\u0631\u0648\u0636\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0641\u064A \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u062D\u062F\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062A\u064A \u062A\u0642\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0623\u0633\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0642. \u062C\u0627\u062F\u0644\u062A \u062D\u0643\u0648\u0645\u0629 \u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0629 \u0641\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0627 \u0628\u0623\u0646 \u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646\u0647\u0627 \u0644\u0627 \u064A\u0645\u062B\u0644 \u0627\u0646\u062A\u0647\u0627\u0643\u064B\u0627 \u0644\u0628\u0646\u062F \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0645\u0627\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u0633\u0627\u0648\u064A\u0629 \u0644\u0623\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628\u0629 \u062A\u064F\u0641\u0631\u0636 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0631\u0641\u064A\u0646 \u0628\u063A\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0638\u0631 \u0639\u0646 \u0639\u0631\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u062C\u0627\u0646\u064A\u060C \u0648\u0628\u0627\u0644\u062A\u0627\u0644\u064A \u0641\u0647\u064A \u00AB\u062A\u064F\u0637\u0628\u0651\u0642 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u064A\u0636 \u0648\u063A\u064A\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u064A\u0636 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0642\u062F\u0631 \u0630\u0627\u062A\u0647\u00BB. \u0645\u0639 \u0630\u0644\u0643\u060C \u062E\u0644\u0635\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u0623\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646 \u064A\u0646\u062A\u0647\u0643 \u0628\u0646\u062F \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u0627\u0648\u0627\u0629 \u0641\u064A \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0645\u0627\u064A\u0629 \u0644\u0623\u0646\u0647 \u064A\u0633\u062A\u0646\u062F \u0641\u0642\u0637 \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u00AB\u0627\u0644\u062A\u0645\u064A\u064A\u0632 \u062D\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0642\u00BB \u0648\u062A\u062D\u0638\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0628\u0645\u0648\u062C\u0628\u0647\u060C \u0625\u0630 \u0623\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0645\u0642\u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0628\u0634\u0643\u0644 \u0639\u0627\u0645 \u0648\u0644\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0627\u0637\u0646\u064A\u0646 \u0643\u0627\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0631\u064A\u0629 \u0628\u0641\u0639\u0644\u0647."@ar . . . . . "These statutes also deprive the Lovings of liberty without due process of law in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."@en . "\u064A\u064F\u0639\u062A\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0643\u0645 \u0641\u064A \u0642\u0636\u064A\u0629 \u0644\u0648\u0641\u064A\u0646\u063A \u0636\u062F \u0641\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0627 \u0631\u0642\u0645 388 \u0644\u0639\u0627\u0645 1967 \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631\u064B\u0627 \u062A\u0627\u0631\u064A\u062E\u064A\u064B\u0627 \u0644\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064A\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0631\u064A\u0643\u064A\u0629 \u0628\u0634\u0623\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0642\u0648\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062F\u0646\u064A\u0629\u060C \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0630\u064A \u0642\u0636\u062A \u0641\u064A\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0628\u0623\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0627\u0646\u064A\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062A\u064A \u062A\u062D\u0638\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0628\u064A\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u062A\u0646\u062A\u0647\u0643 \u0628\u0646\u0648\u062F \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0645\u0627\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u0633\u0627\u0648\u064A\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0625\u062C\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u062C\u0628\u0629 \u0641\u064A \u0627\u0644\u062A\u0639\u062F\u064A\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0628\u0639 \u0639\u0634\u0631 \u0644\u062F\u0633\u062A\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u062D\u062F\u0629. \u0627\u0628\u062A\u062F\u0627\u0621\u064B \u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0627\u0645 2013\u060C \u0627\u0633\u062A\u064F\u0634\u0647\u062F \u0628\u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u062D\u0643\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0639\u062A\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0647 \u0633\u0627\u0628\u0642\u0629 \u0641\u064A \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0627\u0643\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u064A\u062F\u0631\u0627\u0644\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u0631\u064A\u0643\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062A\u064A \u062A\u0646\u0635 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u062F\u0645 \u062F\u0633\u062A\u0648\u0631\u064A\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u064A\u0648\u062F \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0641\u0631\u0648\u0636\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0632\u0648\u0627\u062C \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062B\u0644\u064A\u064A\u0646 \u0641\u064A \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064A\u0627\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062A\u062D\u062F\u0629\u060C \u0628\u0645\u0627 \u0641\u064A \u0630\u0644\u0643 \u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062D\u0643\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064A\u0627 \u0644\u0639\u0627\u0645 2015 \u0641\u064A \u0642\u0636\u064A\u0629 \u0623\u0648\u0628\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0641\u064A\u0644 \u0636\u062F \u0647\u0648\u062F\u062C\u064A\u0632."@ar . . . . . . . . . "Loving v. Virginia"@de . . . . "Loving v. Virginia (\u00AB Loving contre l'\u00C9tat de Virginie \u00BB) est une d\u00E9cision de la Cour supr\u00EAme des \u00C9tats-Unis (no 388 U.S. 1), arr\u00EAt\u00E9e le 12 juin 1967. \u00C0 l'unanimit\u00E9 des neuf juges, elle casse une d\u00E9cision de la (en) et d\u00E9clare comme anticonstitutionnelle la loi de cet \u00C9tat interdisant les mariages inter-raciaux. Plus largement, elle abroge toute loi qui apporterait des restrictions au droit au mariage en se fondant sur la race. De telles lois existaient alors dans seize \u00C9tats des \u00C9tats-Unis. Le nom des plaignants, les Loving, donne en anglais un double sens \u00E0 l'intitul\u00E9 de cet arr\u00EAt : Loving v. Virginia peut en effet \u00EAtre traduit litt\u00E9ralement par \u00AB L'Amour contre l'\u00C9tat de Virginie \u00BB."@fr . . . "Loving kontra\u016D Virginio estis usona jura kazo en 1967. La supera kortumo deklaris le\u011Don de la \u015Dtato Virginio nekonstitucia. Temis pri rasa integreca le\u011Do de 1924, kiu malpermesis edzecon inter homoj de malsamaj rasoj. La ju\u011Disto Leon Bazile (e\u0125ante rasan teorion de Johann Friedrich Blumenbach el la 18-a jarcento) proklamis ke Supera Dio kreis la rasojn blanka, nigra, flava, malaja kaj ru\u011Da, kaj li metis ilin sur malsamajn kontinentojn. Kaj krom pro la interfero kun lia aran\u011Do estus neniu kialo por tiaj edzecoj. La fakto ke li apartigis la rasojn montras ke li ne celis por la rasoj intermiksi\u011Di."@eo . . . . . "There can be no question but that Virginia's miscegenation statutes rest solely upon distinctions drawn according to race. The statutes proscribe generally accepted conduct if engaged in by members of different races. Over the years, this Court has consistently repudiated"@en . . . . . . . . "Loving v. Virginia"@en . . . "Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), adalah putusan hak sipil yang dikeluarkan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat. Putusan ini membatalkan . Kasus ini diangkat oleh Mildred Loving, perempuan berkulit hitam, dan Richard Loving, laki-laki berkulit putih, yang dipenjara selama satu tahun di Virginia karena menikahi satu sama lain. Pernikahan mereka melanggar aturan di negara bagian tersebut, , yang melarang pernikahan antara orang \"putih\" dan orang \"\". Mahkamah Agung secara bulat memutuskan bahwa larangan ini tidak konstitusional, membatalkan (1883), dan mengakhiri segala hambatan hukum berdasarkan ras dalam . Setelah putusan ini, jumlah meningkat. Tanggal sidangnya, 12 Juni, diperingati setiap tahun dengan nama (hari mencintai). Putusan sidang ini menjadi tema beberapa lagu dan tiga film, termasuk Loving (2016). Sejak 2013, putusan ini dijadikan acuan dalam sejumlah putusan pengadilan federal A.S. yang menyatakan bahwa larangan tidak konstitusional, termasuk putusan Mahkamah Agung Obergefell v. Hodges tahun 2015."@in . "60725"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\u0644\u0648\u0641\u064A\u0646\u063A \u0636\u062F \u0641\u0631\u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0627"@ar . . . . . . . "Loving v(ersus) Virginia (\u201ELoving gegen Virginia\u201C) ist eine Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs der Vereinigten Staaten, mit der 1967 ein Gesetz des US-Bundesstaates Virginia aufgehoben wurde, durch das sogenannte \u201Egemischtrassige\u201C Ehen zwischen wei\u00DFen und nichtwei\u00DFen Partnern verboten waren. Zum Prozess kam es aufgrund des Falls von Richard und Mildred Loving, die auf der Basis eines seit 1924 in Virginia geltenden Gesetzes wegen ihrer in Washington, D.C. geschlossenen Ehe verurteilt worden waren, da Richard als Wei\u00DFer galt, w\u00E4hrend Mildred von afroamerikanischen und indianischen Vorfahren abstammte. Das Urteil des Obersten Gerichtshofs zugunsten des Ehepaares, das einstimmig fiel, markierte in den USA das juristische Ende aller auf der Hautfarbe basierenden Beschr\u00E4nkungen bei der Eheschlie\u00DFung und gilt deshalb als Grundsatzentscheidung in der Geschichte des Gerichts sowie als Meilenstein der amerikanischen B\u00FCrgerrechtsbewegung."@de . . . . . . . "1967"^^ . . . . . . "El caso Loving contra Virginia, , fue un caso judicial sobre derechos civiles, llevado ante la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, que en la sentencia del mismo sent\u00F3 jurisprudencia invalidando las leyes que prohib\u00EDan el matrimonio interracial en los Estados Unidos. En el caso, m Mildred Loving, una mujer negra, y Richard Loving, un hombre blanco, hab\u00EDan sido condenados a un a\u00F1o de c\u00E1rcel en Virginia por haberse casado. Su matrimonio violaba las del Estado, la Racial Integrity Act de 1924, que prohib\u00EDa todo matrimonio entre personas clasificadas como \"blancas\" con personas clasificadas como \"de color\". La Corte Suprema determin\u00F3 de forma un\u00E1nime que tal prohibici\u00F3n era inconstitucional, dando marcha atr\u00E1s con respecto al criterio del caso Pace contra Alabama (1883) y poniendo fin a toda restricci\u00F3n legal del matrimonio basada en la raza en el pa\u00EDs. El fallo provoc\u00F3 un aumento de los matrimonios interraciales en Estados Unidos y se conmemora anualmente cada 12 de junio con el . Ha sido objeto de varias pel\u00EDculas -Loving, entre otras- y numerosas canciones. Asimismo, desde 2013 comenz\u00F3 a citarse como precedente en discusiones relativas a las restricciones al matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en Estados Unidos, incluyendo el fallo de 2015 del caso Obergefell contra Hodges que legaliz\u00F3 el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en todo el pa\u00EDs."@es . . . . . . "Loving, 388 U.S. at 11\u201312."@en . "Loving v. Virginia (\u00AB Loving contre l'\u00C9tat de Virginie \u00BB) est une d\u00E9cision de la Cour supr\u00EAme des \u00C9tats-Unis (no 388 U.S. 1), arr\u00EAt\u00E9e le 12 juin 1967. \u00C0 l'unanimit\u00E9 des neuf juges, elle casse une d\u00E9cision de la (en) et d\u00E9clare comme anticonstitutionnelle la loi de cet \u00C9tat interdisant les mariages inter-raciaux. Plus largement, elle abroge toute loi qui apporterait des restrictions au droit au mariage en se fondant sur la race. De telles lois existaient alors dans seize \u00C9tats des \u00C9tats-Unis. Le nom des plaignants, les Loving, donne en anglais un double sens \u00E0 l'intitul\u00E9 de cet arr\u00EAt : Loving v. Virginia peut en effet \u00EAtre traduit litt\u00E9ralement par \u00AB L'Amour contre l'\u00C9tat de Virginie \u00BB."@fr . . . "[W]e reject the notion that the mere \"equal application\" of a statute containing racial classifications is enough to remove the classifications from the Fourteenth Amendment's proscription of all invidious racial discriminations ...."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . "Loving contro Virginia (12 giugno 1967) fu un caso giudiziario civile durante il quale la Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti dichiar\u00F2 incostituzionale il Racial Integrity Act del 1924 e ribalt\u00F2 la sentenza Pace v. Alabama del 1883, ponendo fine alle restrizioni legali relative ai matrimoni interrazziali negli Stati Uniti."@it . . . . . . . "Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The case involved Mildred Loving, a woman of color, and her white husband Richard Loving, who in 1958 were sentenced to a year in prison for marrying each other. Their marriage violated Virginia's Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which criminalized marriage between people classified as \"white\" and people classified as \"colored\". The Lovings appealed their conviction to the Supreme Court of Virginia, which upheld it. They then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear their case. In June 1967, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in the Lovings' favor and overturned their convictions. Its decision struck down Virginia's anti-miscegenation law and ended all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States. Virginia had argued that its law was not a violation of the Equal Protection Clause because the punishment was the same regardless of the offender's race, and thus it \"equally burdened\" both whites and non-whites. The Court found that the law nonetheless violated the Equal Protection Clause because it was based solely on \"distinctions drawn according to race\" and outlawed conduct\u2014namely, getting married\u2014that was otherwise generally accepted and which citizens were free to do. Beginning in 2013, the decision was cited as precedent in U.S. federal court decisions holding restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States unconstitutional, including in the Supreme Court decision Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)."@en . . . . . "Loving v. Virginia,"@en . "\uB7EC\uBE59 \uB300 \uBC84\uC9C0\uB2C8\uC544 \uC0AC\uAC74"@ko . "--04-10"^^ . . . "unanimous"@en . . . . . . . . . . "Loving v(ersus) Virginia (\u201ELoving gegen Virginia\u201C) ist eine Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs der Vereinigten Staaten, mit der 1967 ein Gesetz des US-Bundesstaates Virginia aufgehoben wurde, durch das sogenannte \u201Egemischtrassige\u201C Ehen zwischen wei\u00DFen und nichtwei\u00DFen Partnern verboten waren. Zum Prozess kam es aufgrund des Falls von Richard und Mildred Loving, die auf der Basis eines seit 1924 in Virginia geltenden Gesetzes wegen ihrer in Washington, D.C. geschlossenen Ehe verurteilt worden waren, da Richard als Wei\u00DFer galt, w\u00E4hrend Mildred von afroamerikanischen und indianischen Vorfahren abstammte. Das Urteil des Obersten Gerichtshofs zugunsten des Ehepaares, das einstimmig fiel, markierte in den USA das juristische Ende aller auf der Hautfarbe basierenden Beschr\u00E4nkungen bei der Ehes"@de . . . . . . . . . . . . "2017-04-06"^^ . . . . "Stewart"@en . . . "17280.0"^^ . . "Warren"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . "Lovingovi vs. Virginie (anglicky: Loving v. Virginia), 388 U.S. 1, je p\u0159\u00EDpad Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00EDho soudu Spojen\u00FDch st\u00E1t\u016F americk\u00FDch z roku 1967, kter\u00FD zru\u0161il platnost z\u00E1kon\u016F zakazuj\u00EDc\u00EDch rasov\u011B sm\u00ED\u0161en\u00E1 man\u017Eelstv\u00ED. \u017Daluj\u00EDc\u00ED strana byli \u010Derno\u0161ka Mildred Dolores Loving (za svobodna Jeter) a b\u011Bloch Richard Perry Loving z Virginie. Ve Virginii, stejn\u011B jako v dal\u0161\u00EDch 16 st\u00E1tech USA, byl v platnosti z\u00E1kon striktn\u011B zakazuj\u00EDc\u00ED rasov\u011B sm\u00ED\u0161en\u00E1 man\u017Eelstv\u00ED. Lovingovi byli odd\u00E1ni v \u010Dervnu 1958 ve Washingtonu DC, kde \u017E\u00E1dn\u00FD takov\u00FD z\u00E1kon neexistoval a vr\u00E1tili se zp\u011Bt do Virginie. O p\u011Bt t\u00FDdn\u016F pozd\u011Bji ale novoman\u017Eele uprost\u0159ed noci probudili t\u0159i policist\u00E9, kte\u0159\u00ED vtrhli p\u0159\u00EDmo do jejich lo\u017Enice. P\u00E1r byl odsouzen st\u00E1tem Virginie na rok do v\u011Bzen\u00ED (s podm\u00EDne\u010Dn\u00FDm odlo\u017Een\u00EDm na 25 let v p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B, \u017Ee Virginii opust\u00ED). Lovingovi tedy Virginii opustili a p\u0159est\u011Bhovali se do Washingtonu DC. Inspirov\u00E1na hnut\u00EDm za rovnopr\u00E1vnost \u010Dernoch\u016F veden\u00FDm Martinem Lutherem Kingem napsala Mildred dopis Robertu Kennedymu, tehdej\u0161\u00EDmu ministru spravedlnosti, ve kter\u00E9m mu jejich situaci zevrubn\u011B popsala. Kennedy j\u00ED odepsal s t\u00EDm, \u017Ee se m\u00E1 o pomoc obr\u00E1tit na Americk\u00FD svaz pro ob\u010Dansk\u00E9 svobody (ACLU). Lovingovi tak u\u010Dinili, najali si zde pr\u00E1vn\u00EDky a v roce 1963 za\u017Ealovali st\u00E1t Virginie. V roce 1967 se soudci Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00EDho soudu jednomysln\u011B p\u0159iklonili na jejich stranu v po\u010Dtu 9 ku 0. T\u00EDmto rozhodnut\u00EDm byla sm\u00ED\u0161en\u00E1 man\u017Eelstv\u00ED legalizov\u00E1na ve v\u0161ech st\u00E1tech USA bez ohledu na m\u00EDstn\u00ED z\u00E1kony."@cs . "Caso Loving contra Virginia"@es . . "Loving v. Virginia"@fr . . . "Loving v. Virginia"@in . . . . . "\u041B\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043D\u0433 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0442\u0438\u0432 \u0412\u0438\u0440\u0433\u0438\u043D\u0438\u0438 388 U.S. 1 (1967) \u2014 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043A\u043E\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043E\u0432\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u0421\u0428\u0410, \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043D\u043E\u0432\u0438\u0432\u0448\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u043E\u0431\u043E\u0434\u0443 \u0441\u043C\u0435\u0448\u0430\u043D\u043D\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u043E\u0432. \u0420\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0431\u044B\u043B\u043E \u043F\u043E\u0434\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u043D\u043E \u0435\u0434\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043B\u0430\u0441\u043D\u043E \u0432\u0441\u0435\u043C\u0438 \u0447\u043B\u0435\u043D\u0430\u043C\u0438 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430."@ru . . . . . "1967"^^ . . . "\u30E9\u30F4\u30A3\u30F3\u30B0\u5BFE\u30F4\u30A1\u30FC\u30B8\u30CB\u30A2\u5DDE\u88C1\u5224"@ja . "\u30E9\u30F4\u30A3\u30F3\u30B0\u5BFE\u30F4\u30A1\u30FC\u30B8\u30CB\u30A2\u5DDE\u88C1\u5224\uFF08\u30E9\u30F4\u30A4\u30F3\u30B0\u305F\u3044\u30F4\u30A1\u30FC\u30B8\u30CB\u30A2\u3057\u3085\u3046\u3055\u3044\u3070\u3093\u3001\u82F1\u8A9E: Loving v. Virginia\u3001388 U.S. 1 (1967)\uFF09\u306F\u3001\u7570\u4EBA\u7A2E\u9593\u7D50\u5A5A\u306B\u3064\u3044\u3066\u30011967\u5E746\u670812\u65E5\u306B\u5408\u8846\u56FD\u6700\u9AD8\u88C1\u5224\u6240\u304C\u884C\u3063\u305F\u88C1\u5224\u3067\u3042\u308B\u3002\u516C\u6C11\u6A29\u306B\u95A2\u3057\u3066\u306E\u753B\u671F\u7684\u306A\u5224\u6C7A\u3067\u3042\u308A\u3001\u7570\u4EBA\u7A2E\u9593\u7D50\u5A5A\u3092\u7981\u3058\u308B\u6CD5\u5F8B\u3092\u7121\u52B9\u306B\u3059\u308B\u3082\u306E\u3067\u3042\u3063\u305F\u3002"@ja . . "Loving, 388 U.S. at 8, 10 ."@en . . . . . . . "..."@en . . "Pace v. Alabama"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Loving, 388 U.S. at 11 ."@en . . . "Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Beginning in 2013, the decision was cited as precedent in U.S. federal court decisions holding restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States unconstitutional, including in the Supreme Court decision Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)."@en . . "Richard Perry Loving, Mildred Jeter Loving v. Virginia"@en . . "Loving kontra\u016D Virginio estis usona jura kazo en 1967. La supera kortumo deklaris le\u011Don de la \u015Dtato Virginio nekonstitucia. Temis pri rasa integreca le\u011Do de 1924, kiu malpermesis edzecon inter homoj de malsamaj rasoj. Malsamrasanoj Mildred Jeter and Richard Perry Loving lo\u011Dis en Virginio, kie ili ne rajtis geedzi\u011Di, do ili iris al apuda Distrikto Kolumbio, kie tia edzeco la\u016Dle\u011Dis, tiam revenis al Virginio kiel edzino kaj edzo. Tie la geedzoj (kies angla familia nomo \"Loving\" ironie signifas \"amantaj\") estis arestitaj de la \u015Dtato Virginio, kiu kondamnis ilin, kaj ordonis ilin pasigi jaron en malliberejo. La \u015Dtato nuligis la malliberejan punon kondi\u0109e ke ili eliru la \u015Dtaton por 25 jaroj. La ju\u011Disto Leon Bazile (e\u0125ante rasan teorion de Johann Friedrich Blumenbach el la 18-a jarcento) proklamis ke Supera Dio kreis la rasojn blanka, nigra, flava, malaja kaj ru\u011Da, kaj li metis ilin sur malsamajn kontinentojn. Kaj krom pro la interfero kun lia aran\u011Do estus neniu kialo por tiaj edzecoj. La fakto ke li apartigis la rasojn montras ke li ne celis por la rasoj intermiksi\u011Di. La Loving-oj translo\u011Di\u011Dis al Distrikto Kolumbio, kaj en 1963 ekprocesis por nuligi la kondamnon (argumente la\u016D la 14-a amendo de la konstitucio usona), kaj la kazo finfine atingis la superan kortumon. \u0108iuj na\u016D ju\u011Distoj de la supera kortumo konsentis ke la virginia le\u011Do estis kontra\u016D la konstitucio, kaj malakceptis la argumenton de Virginio ke la le\u011Do ne rasismas \u0109ar \u011Di egale punas blankulojn kaj nigrulojn. En la decido, skribis la kortumo: Edzeco estas unu el la \"bazaj civitaj rajtoj de homo,\" fundamenta al nia ekzisto kaj elteno.... Nei tiun fundamentan liberon la\u016D tiom ne subtenebla bazo kiom rasa klasifiko en tiuj statutoj, klasifikoj tiom rekta subfosa al la principo de egaleco je la koro de la 14-a Amendo, certe senigas liberon al \u0109iuj \u015Dtataj civitanoj sen justa jura procezo. La 14-a Amendo postulas ke la libero de elekto edzi\u011Di ne estu limigita de malicaj rasaj diskriminacioj. Sub nia Konstitucio, la libero edzi\u011Di, a\u016D ne edzi\u011Di, al persono de alia raso restas \u0109e la individuo kaj ne rajtas esti limigita de la \u015Ctato. Spite tion, tiaj le\u011Doj restis en la konstitucioj de pluraj usonaj \u015Dtatoj, \u011Dis 2000, kiam Alabamo estis la lasta forigi sian le\u011Don kontra\u016D durasa edzeco."@eo . . . . "\u041B\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043D\u0433 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0442\u0438\u0432 \u0412\u0438\u0440\u0433\u0438\u043D\u0438\u0438"@ru . . "Loving contro Virginia"@it . . .