. . . . . . "\u539F\u59CB\u85CF\u7DEC\u8A9E\uFF08\u82F1\u8A9E\uFF1AProto-Tibeto-Burman language\uFF0C\u7F29\u5199\uFF1APTB\uFF09\uFF0C\u662F\u4E00\u7A2E\u7956\u8A9E\uFF0C\u5206\u652F\u81EA\u539F\u59CB\u6F22\u85CF\u8A9E\uFF0C\u70BA\u85CF\u7DEC\u8A9E\u7CFB\u7684\u5171\u540C\u5148\u7956\u3002\u539F\u59CB\u85CF\u7DEC\u8A9E\u7684\u5B78\u8AAA\uFF0C\u6700\u65E9\u7531\u767D\u4FDD\u7F85\u8207\u99AC\u8482\u7D22\u592B\uFF08James Matisoff\uFF09\u6240\u63D0\u51FA\u3002 \u8A31\u591A\u8A9E\u8A00\u5B66\u8005\u8BA4\u4E3A\u4E0D\u5305\u542B\u6C49\u8BED\u7684\u85CF\u7F05\u8BED\u65CF\u5F62\u4E0D\u6210\u6C49\u85CF\u8BED\u7CFB\u4E0B\u7684\u5355\u7CFB\u7FA4\uFF0C\u56E0\u6B64\u539F\u59CB\u85CF\u7F05\u8BED\u7B49\u540C\u4E8E\u539F\u59CB\u6C49\u85CF\u8BED\u3002"@zh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\u539F\u59CB\u85CF\u7DEC\u8A9E"@zh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "45912"^^ . . . . . . . "30017713"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Proto-Tibeto-Burman language"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "PTB"@en . . "Sino-Tibetan"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Proto-Tibeto-Burman (commonly abbreviated PTB) is the reconstructed ancestor of the Tibeto-Burman languages, that is, the Sino-Tibetan languages except for Chinese. An initial reconstruction was produced by Paul K. Benedict and since refined by James Matisoff. Several other researchers argue that the Tibeto-Burman languages sans Chinese do not constitute a monophyletic group within Sino-Tibetan, and therefore that Proto-Tibeto-Burman was the same language as Proto-Sino-Tibetan."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "1106662697"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "may be equivalent to Proto-Sino-Tibetan"@en . . . . "Proto-Tibeto-Burman (commonly abbreviated PTB) is the reconstructed ancestor of the Tibeto-Burman languages, that is, the Sino-Tibetan languages except for Chinese. An initial reconstruction was produced by Paul K. Benedict and since refined by James Matisoff. Several other researchers argue that the Tibeto-Burman languages sans Chinese do not constitute a monophyletic group within Sino-Tibetan, and therefore that Proto-Tibeto-Burman was the same language as Proto-Sino-Tibetan."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\u539F\u59CB\u85CF\u7DEC\u8A9E\uFF08\u82F1\u8A9E\uFF1AProto-Tibeto-Burman language\uFF0C\u7F29\u5199\uFF1APTB\uFF09\uFF0C\u662F\u4E00\u7A2E\u7956\u8A9E\uFF0C\u5206\u652F\u81EA\u539F\u59CB\u6F22\u85CF\u8A9E\uFF0C\u70BA\u85CF\u7DEC\u8A9E\u7CFB\u7684\u5171\u540C\u5148\u7956\u3002\u539F\u59CB\u85CF\u7DEC\u8A9E\u7684\u5B78\u8AAA\uFF0C\u6700\u65E9\u7531\u767D\u4FDD\u7F85\u8207\u99AC\u8482\u7D22\u592B\uFF08James Matisoff\uFF09\u6240\u63D0\u51FA\u3002 \u8A31\u591A\u8A9E\u8A00\u5B66\u8005\u8BA4\u4E3A\u4E0D\u5305\u542B\u6C49\u8BED\u7684\u85CF\u7F05\u8BED\u65CF\u5F62\u4E0D\u6210\u6C49\u85CF\u8BED\u7CFB\u4E0B\u7684\u5355\u7CFB\u7FA4\uFF0C\u56E0\u6B64\u539F\u59CB\u85CF\u7F05\u8BED\u7B49\u540C\u4E8E\u539F\u59CB\u6C49\u85CF\u8BED\u3002"@zh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Proto-Tibeto-Burman"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .