"\uC6D0\uACE0\uC801\uACA9(\u539F\u544A\u9069\u683C)\uC774\uB780 \uC18C\uB97C \uC81C\uAE30\uD560 \uC218 \uC788\uB294 \uB2F9\uC0AC\uC790\uC801\uACA9\uC744 \uB73B\uD55C\uB2E4. \uC6D0\uACE0\uC801\uACA9\uC774 \uC5C6\uB294 \uC790\uC758 \uC18C\uB294 \uBD80\uC801\uBC95\uD558\uC5EC \uAC01\uD558 \uD310\uACB0\uC744 \uBC1B\uAC8C \uB41C\uB2E4."@ko . . "La legitimaci\u00F3n procesal es un concepto que alude a la facultad que debe ostentar un determinado sujeto de derecho para actuar en un proceso con relaci\u00F3n a una materia litigiosa. Se relaciona con las instituciones jur\u00EDdicas denominadas legitimatio ad causam y legitimatio ad processum; la primera referida a la necesidad de que el sujeto que pretenda ser parte de un proceso sea titular del derecho en conflicto cuya tutela reclama y la segunda referida a la capacidad personal de intervenir en dicho proceso por estar habilitado por ley para ello, ya sea que el sujeto obre por s\u00ED mismo o en representaci\u00F3n de un tercero.\u200B De acuerdo con el Diccionario de la lengua espa\u00F1ola la legitimaci\u00F3n procesal es la \"posibilidad de una persona para ser parte activa o pasiva en un proceso o procedimiento por "@es . . . . "In het procesrecht is het belang het voordeel dat een eiser kan verkrijgen uit zijn rechtsvordering. Het is een voorwaarde opdat de vordering toelaatbaar zou zijn (pas d'int\u00E9r\u00EAt, pas d'action). Aan welke criteria dit voordeel moet voldoen, verschilt van rechtsstelsel tot rechtsstelsel. Door een tendens naar verruiming komen collectieve belangen meer en meer in aanmerking voor procesvoering."@nl . . . . . "Taler\u00E4tt"@sv . . . . . . . . "\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\uFF08\u3068\u3046\u3058\u3057\u3083\u3066\u304D\u304B\u304F\uFF09\u3068\u306F\u3001\u500B\u3005\u306E\u8A34\u8A1F\u306B\u304A\u3044\u3066\u3001\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u3068\u3057\u3066\u8A34\u8A1F\u3092\u8FFD\u884C\u3057\u3001\u5224\u6C7A\u306A\u3069\u306E\u540D\u5B9B\u4EBA\u3068\u306A\u308B\u3053\u3068\u306B\u3088\u308A\u3001\u6709\u52B9\u306A\u7D1B\u4E89\u89E3\u6C7A\u3092\u3082\u305F\u3089\u3059\u3053\u3068\u304C\u3067\u304D\u308B\u5730\u4F4D\u3092\u3044\u3046\u3002 \u539F\u544A\u306B\u3064\u3044\u3066\u306E\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u306E\u3053\u3068\u3092\u539F\u544A\u9069\u683C\u3001\u88AB\u544A\u306B\u3064\u3044\u3066\u306E\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u306E\u3053\u3068\u3092\u88AB\u544A\u9069\u683C\u3068\u3082\u3044\u3046\u3002\u307E\u305F\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u3092\u6709\u3059\u308B\u8005\u3092\u8A34\u8A1F\u8FFD\u884C\u6A29\u3092\u6709\u3059\u308B\u8005\u3068\u3044\u3046\u3002 \u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u306F\u3001\u500B\u3005\u306E\u8A34\u8A1F\u306B\u304A\u3044\u3066\u3001\u305D\u306E\u8005\u304C\u8A34\u8A1F\u3092\u63D0\u8D77\u3059\u308B\u8CC7\u683C\u304C\u3042\u308B\u304B\u3069\u3046\u304B\u3001\u8A34\u8A1F\u3092\u63D0\u8D77\u3059\u308B\u306E\u306B\u3075\u3055\u308F\u3057\u3044\u5C5E\u6027\u3092\u6709\u3057\u3066\u3044\u308B\u304B\u3069\u3046\u304B\u3092\u554F\u984C\u3068\u3059\u308B\u3082\u306E\u3067\u3042\u308B\u3002"@ja . . "\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\uFF08\u3068\u3046\u3058\u3057\u3083\u3066\u304D\u304B\u304F\uFF09\u3068\u306F\u3001\u500B\u3005\u306E\u8A34\u8A1F\u306B\u304A\u3044\u3066\u3001\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u3068\u3057\u3066\u8A34\u8A1F\u3092\u8FFD\u884C\u3057\u3001\u5224\u6C7A\u306A\u3069\u306E\u540D\u5B9B\u4EBA\u3068\u306A\u308B\u3053\u3068\u306B\u3088\u308A\u3001\u6709\u52B9\u306A\u7D1B\u4E89\u89E3\u6C7A\u3092\u3082\u305F\u3089\u3059\u3053\u3068\u304C\u3067\u304D\u308B\u5730\u4F4D\u3092\u3044\u3046\u3002 \u539F\u544A\u306B\u3064\u3044\u3066\u306E\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u306E\u3053\u3068\u3092\u539F\u544A\u9069\u683C\u3001\u88AB\u544A\u306B\u3064\u3044\u3066\u306E\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u306E\u3053\u3068\u3092\u88AB\u544A\u9069\u683C\u3068\u3082\u3044\u3046\u3002\u307E\u305F\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u3092\u6709\u3059\u308B\u8005\u3092\u8A34\u8A1F\u8FFD\u884C\u6A29\u3092\u6709\u3059\u308B\u8005\u3068\u3044\u3046\u3002 \u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C\u306F\u3001\u500B\u3005\u306E\u8A34\u8A1F\u306B\u304A\u3044\u3066\u3001\u305D\u306E\u8005\u304C\u8A34\u8A1F\u3092\u63D0\u8D77\u3059\u308B\u8CC7\u683C\u304C\u3042\u308B\u304B\u3069\u3046\u304B\u3001\u8A34\u8A1F\u3092\u63D0\u8D77\u3059\u308B\u306E\u306B\u3075\u3055\u308F\u3057\u3044\u5C5E\u6027\u3092\u6709\u3057\u3066\u3044\u308B\u304B\u3069\u3046\u304B\u3092\u554F\u984C\u3068\u3059\u308B\u3082\u306E\u3067\u3042\u308B\u3002"@ja . . . . . "Die Klagebefugnis oder Prozessf\u00FChrungsbefugnis (auch Beschwerdebefugnis genannt) ist ein Begriff aus dem deutschen Prozessrecht. Der Kl\u00E4ger ist klagebefugt, wenn er geltend macht, in eigenen subjektiven Rechten verletzt zu sein. Viele Verfahrensarten kennen die Klagebefugnis als Zul\u00E4ssigkeitsvoraussetzung, das hei\u00DFt, dass die Klage bei fehlender Klagebefugnis bereits als unzul\u00E4ssig abgewiesen wird, ohne dass \u00FCberhaupt zur Sache (Begr\u00FCndetheit) entschieden w\u00FCrde. Auf das Erfordernis der Verletzung in eigenen Rechten kann nur da verzichtet werden, wo ein Gesetz auch Dritten ein Klagerecht einr\u00E4umt, etwa in Form der Verbandsklage."@de . . . . . . . . "La legittimazione processuale \u00E8 un concetto elaborato dai giuristi del XX secolo per esprimere la posizione soggettiva di colui che, titolare della domanda giudiziale proposta, diviene titolare di altri poteri nell'ambito del processo. Nel codice di procedura civile questo concetto non \u00E8 stato formalmente fatto proprio dal legislatore, e ne \u00E8 di conseguenza scaturita una certa confusione. Art. 75 (Capacit\u00E0 processuale): Di fatto riunisce due concetti, quello della legittimazione processuale e quello della capacit\u00E0 giuridica."@it . . . . . . . . . . . . "Int\u00E9r\u00EAt \u00E0 agir"@fr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Legitimaci\u00F3n procesal"@es . . . . . "\uC6D0\uACE0\uC801\uACA9"@ko . . . . . . . . . . "Legitymacja procesowa \u2013 oznacza wynikaj\u0105ce z przepis\u00F3w prawa materialnego b\u0105d\u017A prawa procesowego uprawnienie do uczestniczenia w konkretnym post\u0119powaniu cywilnym w charakterze powoda (legitymacja czynna) lub pozwanego (legitymacja bierna) lub dokonania okre\u015Blonej czynno\u015Bci procesowej. Brak legitymacji biernej nie stanowi przes\u0142anki do odrzucenia pozwu, lecz do oddalenia pow\u00F3dztwa. Legitymacja procesowa nale\u017Cy do przes\u0142anek materialnych, przez kt\u00F3re nale\u017Cy rozumie\u0107 okoliczno\u015Bci stanowi\u0105ce w \u015Bwietle norm prawa materialnego warunki poszukiwania ochrony prawnej na drodze s\u0105dowej. Legitymacja procesowa jest przes\u0142ank\u0105 merytoryczn\u0105, o kt\u00F3rej istnieniu przes\u0105dzaj\u0105 przepisy prawa materialnego, maj\u0105ce zastosowanie w konkretnym stanie faktycznym, nie za\u015B przepisy procesowe, jej brak nie prowadzi do odrzucenia pozwu, lecz do oddalenia pow\u00F3dztwa."@pl . "Standing (law)"@en . "1113278108"^^ . . "Legitymacja procesowa \u2013 oznacza wynikaj\u0105ce z przepis\u00F3w prawa materialnego b\u0105d\u017A prawa procesowego uprawnienie do uczestniczenia w konkretnym post\u0119powaniu cywilnym w charakterze powoda (legitymacja czynna) lub pozwanego (legitymacja bierna) lub dokonania okre\u015Blonej czynno\u015Bci procesowej."@pl . "Belang (recht)"@nl . . . . . . "L'int\u00E9r\u00EAt \u00E0 agir (standing en anglais, voire locus standi en latin) d\u00E9signe le motif permettant \u00E0 un individu de se pr\u00E9valoir d'un int\u00E9r\u00EAt l\u00E9s\u00E9 et pour lequel il se pourvoit en justice. Une juridiction peut rejeter l'action d'un justiciable en d\u00E9clarant qu'il n'a pas d'int\u00E9r\u00EAt (direct ou indirect) \u00E0 agir. L'int\u00E9r\u00EAt \u00E0 agir est donc une caract\u00E9ristique fondamentale d\u00E9finissant les contours de la notion de sujet de droit."@fr . . "Legitymacja procesowa"@pl . "La legittimazione processuale \u00E8 un concetto elaborato dai giuristi del XX secolo per esprimere la posizione soggettiva di colui che, titolare della domanda giudiziale proposta, diviene titolare di altri poteri nell'ambito del processo. Nel codice di procedura civile questo concetto non \u00E8 stato formalmente fatto proprio dal legislatore, e ne \u00E8 di conseguenza scaturita una certa confusione. Art. 75 (Capacit\u00E0 processuale): La Corte costituzionale, con sentenza n. 220 del 16 ottobre 1986, ha dichiarato l'illegittimit\u00E0 costituzionale di quell'articolo nella parte in cui non prevede, ove emerga una situazione di scomparsa del convenuto, la interruzione del processo e la segnalazione, ad opera del giudice, del caso al pubblico ministero perch\u00E9 promuova la nomina di un curatore, nei cui confronti debba l'attore riassumere il giudizio. Di fatto riunisce due concetti, quello della legittimazione processuale e quello della capacit\u00E0 giuridica. Secondo la distinzione delle parti processuali in attore e convenuto si parla di legittimazione ad agire e legittimazione a contraddire, o pi\u00F9 frequentemente di legittimazione attiva e legittimazione passiva. Il difetto di legittimazione attiva consiste, secondo la Cassazione , nella mancanza della titolarit\u00E0 del rapporto giuridico dedotto in giudizio, per inesistenza del diritto o per essere di un terzo il diritto fatto valere, sicch\u00E9 la relativa pronuncia \u00E8 una decisione di merito e non di rito, idonea a passare in cosa giudicata formale e sostanziale, preclusiva della possibilit\u00E0 di riproporre la stessa domanda in altro giudizio."@it . "49307"^^ . "33204"^^ . "Die Klagebefugnis oder Prozessf\u00FChrungsbefugnis (auch Beschwerdebefugnis genannt) ist ein Begriff aus dem deutschen Prozessrecht. Der Kl\u00E4ger ist klagebefugt, wenn er geltend macht, in eigenen subjektiven Rechten verletzt zu sein. Viele Verfahrensarten kennen die Klagebefugnis als Zul\u00E4ssigkeitsvoraussetzung, das hei\u00DFt, dass die Klage bei fehlender Klagebefugnis bereits als unzul\u00E4ssig abgewiesen wird, ohne dass \u00FCberhaupt zur Sache (Begr\u00FCndetheit) entschieden w\u00FCrde."@de . . . . . . "\uC6D0\uACE0\uC801\uACA9(\u539F\u544A\u9069\u683C)\uC774\uB780 \uC18C\uB97C \uC81C\uAE30\uD560 \uC218 \uC788\uB294 \uB2F9\uC0AC\uC790\uC801\uACA9\uC744 \uB73B\uD55C\uB2E4. \uC6D0\uACE0\uC801\uACA9\uC774 \uC5C6\uB294 \uC790\uC758 \uC18C\uB294 \uBD80\uC801\uBC95\uD558\uC5EC \uAC01\uD558 \uD310\uACB0\uC744 \uBC1B\uAC8C \uB41C\uB2E4."@ko . . . "Taler\u00E4tt (lat. locus standi) \u00E4r r\u00E4tten att f\u00F6ra talan inf\u00F6r domstol i en r\u00E4ttslig angel\u00E4genhet som r\u00F6r fullg\u00F6relse eller fastst\u00E4llelse av att ett visst r\u00E4ttsf\u00F6rh\u00E5llande best\u00E5r."@sv . . . . . . . . . "Legittimazione processuale"@it . . . . . . . "Taler\u00E4tt (lat. locus standi) \u00E4r r\u00E4tten att f\u00F6ra talan inf\u00F6r domstol i en r\u00E4ttslig angel\u00E4genhet som r\u00F6r fullg\u00F6relse eller fastst\u00E4llelse av att ett visst r\u00E4ttsf\u00F6rh\u00E5llande best\u00E5r."@sv . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Klagebefugnis"@de . "\u5F53\u4E8B\u8005\u9069\u683C"@ja . . . . . . "Kedudukan hukum atau locus standi adalah suatu keadaan ketika suatu pihak dianggap memenuhi syarat untuk mengajukan permohonan penyelesaian sengketa di suatu pengadilan. Biasanya kedudukan hukum dapat ditunjukkan dengan cara berikut:"@in . . . . "Kedudukan hukum"@in . . . . "In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have, by demonstrating to the court, sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case. A party has standing in the following situations: \n* The party is directly subject to an adverse effect by the statute or action in question, and the harm suffered will continue unless the court grants relief in the form of damages or a finding that the law either does not apply to the party or that the law is void or can be nullified. This is called the \"something to lose\" doctrine, in which the party has standing because they will be directly harmed by the conditions for which they are asking the court for relief. \n* The party is not directly harmed by the conditions by which they are petitioning the court for relief but asks for it because the harm involved has some reasonable relation to their situation, and the continued existence of the harm may affect others who might not be able to ask a court for relief. In the United States, this is the grounds for asking for a law to be struck down as violating the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, because while the plaintiff might not be directly affected, the law might so adversely affect others that one might never know what was not done or created by those who fear they would become subject to the law. This is known as the \"chilling effects\" doctrine. \n* The party is granted automatic standing by act of law. Under some environmental laws in the United States, a party may sue someone causing pollution to certain waterways without a federal permit, even if the party suing is not harmed by the pollution being generated. The law allows the plaintiff to receive attorney's fees if they substantially prevail in the action. In some U.S. states, a person who believes a book, film or other work of art is obscene may sue in their own name to have the work banned directly without having to ask a District Attorney to do so. In the United States, the current doctrine is that a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless they can demonstrate that they are or will \"imminently\" be harmed by the law. Otherwise, the court will rule that the plaintiff \"lacks standing\" to bring the suit, and will dismiss the case without considering the merits of the claim of unconstitutionality."@en . . "L'int\u00E9r\u00EAt \u00E0 agir (standing en anglais, voire locus standi en latin) d\u00E9signe le motif permettant \u00E0 un individu de se pr\u00E9valoir d'un int\u00E9r\u00EAt l\u00E9s\u00E9 et pour lequel il se pourvoit en justice. Une juridiction peut rejeter l'action d'un justiciable en d\u00E9clarant qu'il n'a pas d'int\u00E9r\u00EAt (direct ou indirect) \u00E0 agir. L'int\u00E9r\u00EAt \u00E0 agir est donc une caract\u00E9ristique fondamentale d\u00E9finissant les contours de la notion de sujet de droit. De nombreux syst\u00E8mes juridiques ont \u00E9tendu l'int\u00E9r\u00EAt \u00E0 agir \u00E0 la d\u00E9fense de causes dites d'\u00AB int\u00E9r\u00EAt public \u00BB. Cela est particuli\u00E8rement pr\u00E9sent, par exemple, en droit de l'environnement, o\u00F9 une association peut se pr\u00E9valoir de d\u00E9fendre l'int\u00E9r\u00EAt public concernant le droit \u00E0 vivre dans un environnement sain. L'extension de l'int\u00E9r\u00EAt public permet \u00E0 des associations de se porter partie civile."@fr . . . . . . "La legitimaci\u00F3n procesal es un concepto que alude a la facultad que debe ostentar un determinado sujeto de derecho para actuar en un proceso con relaci\u00F3n a una materia litigiosa. Se relaciona con las instituciones jur\u00EDdicas denominadas legitimatio ad causam y legitimatio ad processum; la primera referida a la necesidad de que el sujeto que pretenda ser parte de un proceso sea titular del derecho en conflicto cuya tutela reclama y la segunda referida a la capacidad personal de intervenir en dicho proceso por estar habilitado por ley para ello, ya sea que el sujeto obre por s\u00ED mismo o en representaci\u00F3n de un tercero.\u200B De acuerdo con el Diccionario de la lengua espa\u00F1ola la legitimaci\u00F3n procesal es la \"posibilidad de una persona para ser parte activa o pasiva en un proceso o procedimiento por su relaci\u00F3n con el objeto litigioso\".\u200B"@es . . . "In het procesrecht is het belang het voordeel dat een eiser kan verkrijgen uit zijn rechtsvordering. Het is een voorwaarde opdat de vordering toelaatbaar zou zijn (pas d'int\u00E9r\u00EAt, pas d'action). Aan welke criteria dit voordeel moet voldoen, verschilt van rechtsstelsel tot rechtsstelsel. Door een tendens naar verruiming komen collectieve belangen meer en meer in aanmerking voor procesvoering."@nl . . . . . . "In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have, by demonstrating to the court, sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case. A party has standing in the following situations:"@en . . . . . . "Kedudukan hukum atau locus standi adalah suatu keadaan ketika suatu pihak dianggap memenuhi syarat untuk mengajukan permohonan penyelesaian sengketa di suatu pengadilan. Biasanya kedudukan hukum dapat ditunjukkan dengan cara berikut: 1. \n* Suatu pihak secara langsung dirugikan oleh undang-undang atau tindakan yang menjadi permasalahan, dan kerugian ini akan terus berlanjut kecuali jika pengadilan turun tangan dengan memerintahkan pemberian kompensasi, menetapkan bahwa hukum yang dipermasalahkan tidak berlaku untuk pihak tersebut, atau menyatakan bahwa undang-undang tersebut batal demi hukum 2. \n* Pihak penuntut tidak dirugikan secara langsung, tetapi mereka memiliki hubungan yang masuk akal dengan situasi yang menyebabkan kerugian tersebut, dan jika dibiarkan kerugian dapat menimpa orang lain yang tidak dapat meminta bantuan dari pengadilan. Di Amerika Serikat, landasan ini digunakan untuk meminta agar suatu undang-undang dibatalkan karena telah melanggar Amendemen Pertama Konstitusi Amerika Serikat 3. \n* Suatu pihak diberi kedudukan hukum oleh suatu undang-undang. Di Amerika Serikat, beberapa hukum lingkungan mengizinkan penuntutan terhadap perusahaan yang mencemari perairan tanpa izin federal, bahkan jika pihak yang menuntut tidak dirugikan oleh polusi tersebut"@in . .