. . . . "Antarctica cooling controversy"@en . . "29628"^^ . . . . . . "The Antarctica cooling controversy was the result of an apparent contradiction in the observed cooling behavior of Antarctica between 1966 and 2000, which became part of the public debate in the global warming controversy, particularly between advocacy groups of both sides in the public arena including politicians, as well as the popular media. In his novel State of Fear, Michael Crichton asserted that the Antarctic data contradict global warming. The few scientists who have commented on the supposed controversy state that there is no contradiction, while the author of the paper whose work inspired Crichton's remarks has said that Crichton misused his results. There is no similar controversy within the scientific community, as the small observed changes in Antarctica are consistent with the small changes predicted by climate models, and because the overall trend since comprehensive observations began is now known to be one of warming."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . "Una aparente contradicci\u00F3n en el comportamiento de enfriamiento observado de Ant\u00E1rtida entre 1966 y 2000 se convirti\u00F3 en parte del debate p\u00FAblico en el controversia sobre el calentamiento global, particularmente entre los grupos de defensa de ambos lados en la arena p\u00FAblica.\u200B incluyendo a pol\u00EDticos,\u200B as\u00ED como en los medios populares. En su novela Estado de miedo, Michael Crichton afirm\u00F3 que los datos ant\u00E1rticos contradec\u00EDan la conjetura del calentamiento global.\u200B Los pocos cient\u00EDficos que han opinado sobre la supuesta controversia afirman que no hay contradicci\u00F3n,\u200B mientras que el autor del art\u00EDculo que inspir\u00F3 los se\u00F1alamientos de Crichton ha dicho que este hizo un \"mal uso\" de sus resultados.\u200B No hay controversia similar en la comunidad cient\u00EDfica,\u200B en tanto los peque\u00F1os cambios observad"@es . . . . . . . . . . . "1105170716"^^ . "Controversia acerca del enfriamiento de la Ant\u00E1rtida"@es . . . . . . . . . . . . "Una aparente contradicci\u00F3n en el comportamiento de enfriamiento observado de Ant\u00E1rtida entre 1966 y 2000 se convirti\u00F3 en parte del debate p\u00FAblico en el controversia sobre el calentamiento global, particularmente entre los grupos de defensa de ambos lados en la arena p\u00FAblica.\u200B incluyendo a pol\u00EDticos,\u200B as\u00ED como en los medios populares. En su novela Estado de miedo, Michael Crichton afirm\u00F3 que los datos ant\u00E1rticos contradec\u00EDan la conjetura del calentamiento global.\u200B Los pocos cient\u00EDficos que han opinado sobre la supuesta controversia afirman que no hay contradicci\u00F3n,\u200B mientras que el autor del art\u00EDculo que inspir\u00F3 los se\u00F1alamientos de Crichton ha dicho que este hizo un \"mal uso\" de sus resultados.\u200B No hay controversia similar en la comunidad cient\u00EDfica,\u200B en tanto los peque\u00F1os cambios observados en la Ant\u00E1rtida son consistentes con los peque\u00F1os cambios predichos por los modelos clim\u00E1ticos, y porque la tendencia general desde que las observaciones exhaustivas comenzaron, es en el sentido del calentamiento. En el Polo Sur, donde algunas de las m\u00E1s fuertes tendencias al enfriamiento fueron observadas entre 1950 y 1990, la tendencia principal es plana desde 1957 hasta 2018."@es . "13956886"^^ . . . . . "The Antarctica cooling controversy was the result of an apparent contradiction in the observed cooling behavior of Antarctica between 1966 and 2000, which became part of the public debate in the global warming controversy, particularly between advocacy groups of both sides in the public arena including politicians, as well as the popular media. In his novel State of Fear, Michael Crichton asserted that the Antarctic data contradict global warming. The few scientists who have commented on the supposed controversy state that there is no contradiction, while the author of the paper whose work inspired Crichton's remarks has said that Crichton misused his results. There is no similar controversy within the scientific community, as the small observed changes in Antarctica are consistent with th"@en . . . . .