. . . . . . . "By not being able to have access to a solicitor prior to being interviewed by the police, Cadder's rights under Article 6(1) ECHR had been breached."@en . . "2010-10-26"^^ . . . . . . . . . . "Cadder v Her Majesty's Advocate"@en . . "Lord Hope , Lords Rodger, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson"@en . "Cadder v HM Advocate"@en . . . . . . . . . . "1113120906"^^ . . . . . . . . . "Cadder v HM Advocate"@en . "Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) is a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the way in which police in Scotland detained suspects was not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and was therefore unlawful in terms of the Scotland Act 1998."@en . . . . . "[2010] UKSC 43, 2011 S.C. 13"@en . "McLean v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 73"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "8200"^^ . . . . . . "29438901"^^ . . "Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) is a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that the way in which police in Scotland detained suspects was not compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and was therefore unlawful in terms of the Scotland Act 1998."@en . . . . . . .