. . . "\u51B0\u5DDD\u6D88\u878D\u4E4B\u4E89"@zh . . . . "The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) is a report on climate change created with the help of a large number of contributors, both scientists and governmental representatives. There has been considerable political controversy over a small number of errors found in the report, and there have been calls for review of the process used to formulate the report. The overwhelming majority view of scientists with expertise in climate change is that errors, when found, are corrected, and the issues as identified do not undermine the conclusions of the report that the climate system is warming in response to increased levels of greenhouse gases, largely due to human activities."@en . . . . . . . . . . "57931"^^ . "Glaciergate"@pl . . . . . . . "\u51B0\u5DDD\u6D88\u878D\u4E4B\u4E89\u6216\u51B0\u5DDD\u4E89\u5435\u662F\u63072010\u5E741\u6708\u7206\u53D1\u7684\u5173\u4E8E\u559C\u9A6C\u62C9\u96C5\u51B0\u5DDD\u5C06\u57282035\u5E74\u6D88\u5931\u7684\u8BF4\u6CD5\u7684\u4E89\u8BBA\u3002\u8FD9\u4E2A\u4E89\u8BAE\u8D77\u6E90\u4E8E\u806F\u5408\u570B\u653F\u5E9C\u9593\u6C23\u5019\u8B8A\u5316\u5C08\u9580\u59D4\u54E1\u6703\u76842007\u5E74\u62A5\u544A\u9884\u6D4B\u559C\u9A6C\u62C9\u96C5\u51B0\u5DDD\u52302035\u5E74\u53EF\u80FD\u7531\u4E8E\u6C14\u5019\u53D8\u5316\u800C\u6D88\u5931\u3002\u8FD9\u9879\u9884\u6D4B\u662F\u5EFA\u7ACB\u5728\u4E00\u4F4D\u79D1\u5B66\u5BB6\u4E0E\u4E00\u4F4D\u8BB0\u8005\u7684\u8C08\u8BDD\u4E0A\u7684\uFF0C\u800C\u540E\u8005\u5982\u4ECA\u628A\u5B83\u79F0\u4E3A\u201C\u731C\u6D4B\u201D\u3002"@zh . . "12150337"^^ . . . . . . "Glaciergate \u2013 nazwa dotycz\u0105ca nieprawid\u0142owo\u015Bci przy ocenie post\u0119pu topnienia lodowc\u00F3w w Himalajach oraz zwi\u0105zanej z nimi procedury naukowej w IV Raporcie Mi\u0119dzyrz\u0105dowego Zespo\u0142u do spraw Zmian Klimatu. B\u0142\u0119dy zosta\u0142y wskazane pod koniec 2009 roku. J. Graham Cogley w raporcie II Grupy Roboczej, w rozdziale 10 z 2007 roku stwierdza, \u017Ce data stopnienia lodowc\u00F3w w Himalajach by\u0142a b\u0142\u0119dnie podana jako rok 2035 zamiast 2350, kt\u00F3ra wyliczona zosta\u0142a w dokumencie opracowanym w ramach International Hydrological Programme pod auspicjami UNESCO z 1996 roku. Skrytykowane zosta\u0142o tak\u017Ce u\u017Cycie danych, kt\u00F3re nie by\u0142y recenzowane w czasopismach naukowych. 20 stycznia 2010 organizacja IPCC wyda\u0142a oficjalny komentarz potwierdzaj\u0105cy, \u017Ce w raporcie II Grupy Roboczej znajduje si\u0119 paragraf, kt\u00F3ry jest oparty na ma\u0142o wiarygodnych danych. Rozdzia\u0142 by\u0142 pisany przez 25 autor\u00F3w pod kierunkiem , kt\u00F3re obecnie pracuje w Imperial College London oraz (argenty\u0144ski meteorolog). Autorami, kt\u00F3rzy koordynowali prac\u0119 nad rozdzia\u0142em, byli , , oraz Wu Shaohong. Cz\u0142on gate w nazwie glaciergate, jest nawi\u0105zaniem do afery Watergate, \"glacier\" to w j\u0119zyku angielskim lodowiec."@pl . . . . "Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report"@en . . . . . . . . . "1118594922"^^ . . "Glaciergate \u2013 nazwa dotycz\u0105ca nieprawid\u0142owo\u015Bci przy ocenie post\u0119pu topnienia lodowc\u00F3w w Himalajach oraz zwi\u0105zanej z nimi procedury naukowej w IV Raporcie Mi\u0119dzyrz\u0105dowego Zespo\u0142u do spraw Zmian Klimatu. B\u0142\u0119dy zosta\u0142y wskazane pod koniec 2009 roku. Rozdzia\u0142 by\u0142 pisany przez 25 autor\u00F3w pod kierunkiem , kt\u00F3re obecnie pracuje w Imperial College London oraz (argenty\u0144ski meteorolog). Autorami, kt\u00F3rzy koordynowali prac\u0119 nad rozdzia\u0142em, byli , , oraz Wu Shaohong. Cz\u0142on gate w nazwie glaciergate, jest nawi\u0105zaniem do afery Watergate, \"glacier\" to w j\u0119zyku angielskim lodowiec."@pl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\u51B0\u5DDD\u6D88\u878D\u4E4B\u4E89\u6216\u51B0\u5DDD\u4E89\u5435\u662F\u63072010\u5E741\u6708\u7206\u53D1\u7684\u5173\u4E8E\u559C\u9A6C\u62C9\u96C5\u51B0\u5DDD\u5C06\u57282035\u5E74\u6D88\u5931\u7684\u8BF4\u6CD5\u7684\u4E89\u8BBA\u3002\u8FD9\u4E2A\u4E89\u8BAE\u8D77\u6E90\u4E8E\u806F\u5408\u570B\u653F\u5E9C\u9593\u6C23\u5019\u8B8A\u5316\u5C08\u9580\u59D4\u54E1\u6703\u76842007\u5E74\u62A5\u544A\u9884\u6D4B\u559C\u9A6C\u62C9\u96C5\u51B0\u5DDD\u52302035\u5E74\u53EF\u80FD\u7531\u4E8E\u6C14\u5019\u53D8\u5316\u800C\u6D88\u5931\u3002\u8FD9\u9879\u9884\u6D4B\u662F\u5EFA\u7ACB\u5728\u4E00\u4F4D\u79D1\u5B66\u5BB6\u4E0E\u4E00\u4F4D\u8BB0\u8005\u7684\u8C08\u8BDD\u4E0A\u7684\uFF0C\u800C\u540E\u8005\u5982\u4ECA\u628A\u5B83\u79F0\u4E3A\u201C\u731C\u6D4B\u201D\u3002"@zh . . . . . "The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) is a report on climate change created with the help of a large number of contributors, both scientists and governmental representatives. There has been considerable political controversy over a small number of errors found in the report, and there have been calls for review of the process used to formulate the report. The overwhelming majority view of scientists with expertise in climate change is that errors, when found, are corrected, and the issues as identified do not undermine the conclusions of the report that the climate system is warming in response to increased levels of greenhouse gases, largely due to human activities."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .