. . . . ""@en . . . "Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd [1916] 2 AC 307 is a UK company law case, concerning the concept of \"control\" and enemy character of a company. It is usually discussed in the context of lifting the corporate veil, however it is merely an example of where the corporate veil is not in issue as a matter of company law, since the decision turns on correct interpretation of a statute."@en . . "53"^^ . . "6880"^^ . . . "[1916] 2 AC 307"@en . . . . "Control, enemy character, lifting the veil"@en . . "[1915] 1 KB 893"@en . . . . . "House of Lords"@en . . "Lord Parker, Earl of Halsbury LC, Lord Atkinson, Viscount Mersey, Lord Kinnear, Lord Sumner, Lord Shaw and Lord Parmoor"@en . . . . . . . . . "[1916] UKHL 845"@en . . . . "Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (GB) Ltd"@en . . . . "Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co Ltd"@en . . . "Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd [1916] 2 AC 307 is a UK company law case, concerning the concept of \"control\" and enemy character of a company. It is usually discussed in the context of lifting the corporate veil, however it is merely an example of where the corporate veil is not in issue as a matter of company law, since the decision turns on correct interpretation of a statute."@en . . . "27916641"^^ . . . . "1104513263"^^ . . . . . . . . . . .