. . . . . . "--12-04"^^ . "Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al., Petitioners v. Christopher M. Sulyma, Respondent"@en . . . "Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al., Petitioners v. Christopher M. Sulyma, Respondent"@en . . . . . . . . . . . "Under the requirement in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 that plaintiffs with \u201Cactual knowledge\u201D of an alleged fiduciary breach must file suit within three years of gaining that knowledge, a plaintiff does not necessarily have \u201Cactual knowledge\u201D of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading. Decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Affirmed."@en . "589"^^ . . . . . . . "172800.0"^^ . . . . . "Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma"@en . . "1075444257"^^ . "unanimous"@en . "25920.0"^^ . . "64489737"^^ . . ""@en . . . . . "Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case. It decided that, for purposes of the requirement in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 that plaintiffs with \u201Cactual knowledge\u201D of an alleged fiduciary breach file suit within three years of gaining that knowledge, a plaintiff does not necessarily have \u201Cactual knowledge\u201D of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading. This affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit."@en . . . . "2019"^^ . . . . "Alito"@en . "___"@en . "Supreme Court"@en . "Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma"@en . "--02-26"^^ . . . . "18"^^ . . "5016"^^ . . "Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case. It decided that, for purposes of the requirement in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 that plaintiffs with \u201Cactual knowledge\u201D of an alleged fiduciary breach file suit within three years of gaining that knowledge, a plaintiff does not necessarily have \u201Cactual knowledge\u201D of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading. This affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit."@en . "2020"^^ .