. . . "En econom\u00EDa, la paradoja de Metzler (llamada as\u00ED por el norteamericano Lloyd Metzler) es la posibilidad te\u00F3rica de que la imposici\u00F3n de un arancel a la importaci\u00F3n pueda reducir el precio interno de ese bien.\u200B Fue propuesto por Lloyd Metzler en 1949 despu\u00E9s de examinar los aranceles dentro del modelo de .\u200B La paradoja tiene la misma forma que el y una transferencia que hace al receptor estar peor que antes.\u200B De todas maneras, se considera que es poco probable que suceda.\u200B\u200B"@es . . "Metzler paradox"@en . . . . . . "Paradoja de Metzler"@es . . "In economics, the Metzler paradox (named after the American economist Lloyd Metzler) is the theoretical possibility that the imposition of a tariff on imports may reduce the relative internal price of that good. It was proposed by Lloyd Metzler in 1949 upon examination of tariffs within the Heckscher\u2013Ohlin model. The paradox has roughly the same status as immiserizing growth and a transfer that makes the recipient worse off. It is deemed to be unlikely in practice."@en . . . . "1044616313"^^ . . . . . . "\u30E1\u30C3\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u306E\u9006\u8AAC"@ja . . . "In economics, the Metzler paradox (named after the American economist Lloyd Metzler) is the theoretical possibility that the imposition of a tariff on imports may reduce the relative internal price of that good. It was proposed by Lloyd Metzler in 1949 upon examination of tariffs within the Heckscher\u2013Ohlin model. The paradox has roughly the same status as immiserizing growth and a transfer that makes the recipient worse off. The strange result could occur if the exporting country's offer curve is very inelastic. In this case, the tariff lowers the duty-free cost of the price of the import by such a great degree that the effect of the improvement of the tariff-imposing countries' terms of trade on relative prices exceeds the amount of the tariff. Such a tariff would not protect the industry competing with the imported goods. It is deemed to be unlikely in practice."@en . . . . "\u30E1\u30C3\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u306E\u9006\u8AAC\uFF08\u3081\u3063\u3064\u3089\u30FC\u306E\u304E\u3083\u304F\u305B\u3064\u3001\u3042\u308B\u3044\u306F\u30E1\u30C3\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u30FB\u30D1\u30E9\u30C9\u30C3\u30AF\u30B9\u3001\u82F1: Metzler paradox\uFF09\u3068\u306F\u3001\u95A2\u7A0E\u3092\u8AB2\u3057\u305F\u3068\u304D\u306B\u8F38\u5165\u8CA1\u306E\u4E16\u754C\u4FA1\u683C\u304C\u5927\u304D\u304F\u4F4E\u4E0B\u3057\u3001\u95A2\u7A0E\u3092\u52A0\u5473\u3057\u305F\u56FD\u5185\u4FA1\u683C\u304C\u95A2\u7A0E\u8CE6\u8AB2\u524D\u3088\u308A\u3082\u4F4E\u4E0B\u3057\u3066\u3057\u307E\u3046\u7406\u8AD6\u7684\u53EF\u80FD\u6027\u306E\u3053\u3068\u3002\u65E5\u672C\u8A9E\u3067\u306F\u30E1\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u306E\u9006\u8AAC\u3068\u8A18\u8FF0\u3055\u308C\u308B\u3053\u3068\u3082\u3042\u308B\u3002\u30ED\u30A4\u30C9\u30FB\u30E1\u30C3\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u306B\u3088\u3063\u3066\u305D\u306E\u53EF\u80FD\u6027\u304C\u793A\u3055\u308C\u305F\u3002"@ja . "2561"^^ . . . "20188411"^^ . . . . . "\u30E1\u30C3\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u306E\u9006\u8AAC\uFF08\u3081\u3063\u3064\u3089\u30FC\u306E\u304E\u3083\u304F\u305B\u3064\u3001\u3042\u308B\u3044\u306F\u30E1\u30C3\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u30FB\u30D1\u30E9\u30C9\u30C3\u30AF\u30B9\u3001\u82F1: Metzler paradox\uFF09\u3068\u306F\u3001\u95A2\u7A0E\u3092\u8AB2\u3057\u305F\u3068\u304D\u306B\u8F38\u5165\u8CA1\u306E\u4E16\u754C\u4FA1\u683C\u304C\u5927\u304D\u304F\u4F4E\u4E0B\u3057\u3001\u95A2\u7A0E\u3092\u52A0\u5473\u3057\u305F\u56FD\u5185\u4FA1\u683C\u304C\u95A2\u7A0E\u8CE6\u8AB2\u524D\u3088\u308A\u3082\u4F4E\u4E0B\u3057\u3066\u3057\u307E\u3046\u7406\u8AD6\u7684\u53EF\u80FD\u6027\u306E\u3053\u3068\u3002\u65E5\u672C\u8A9E\u3067\u306F\u30E1\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u306E\u9006\u8AAC\u3068\u8A18\u8FF0\u3055\u308C\u308B\u3053\u3068\u3082\u3042\u308B\u3002\u30ED\u30A4\u30C9\u30FB\u30E1\u30C3\u30C4\u30E9\u30FC\u306B\u3088\u3063\u3066\u305D\u306E\u53EF\u80FD\u6027\u304C\u793A\u3055\u308C\u305F\u3002"@ja . "En econom\u00EDa, la paradoja de Metzler (llamada as\u00ED por el norteamericano Lloyd Metzler) es la posibilidad te\u00F3rica de que la imposici\u00F3n de un arancel a la importaci\u00F3n pueda reducir el precio interno de ese bien.\u200B Fue propuesto por Lloyd Metzler en 1949 despu\u00E9s de examinar los aranceles dentro del modelo de .\u200B La paradoja tiene la misma forma que el y una transferencia que hace al receptor estar peor que antes.\u200B Este extra\u00F1o fen\u00F3meno podr\u00EDa ocurrir si el pa\u00EDs exportador posee una curva de oferta muy inel\u00E1stica. En ese caso, un arancel m\u00E1s bajo que el costo del bien \"libre de impuestos\", el precio de la importaci\u00F3n ser\u00E1 tan grande que el efecto de un aumento en t\u00E9rminos de intercambio de cada pa\u00EDs en precios relativos, supera la cantidad del arancel. Un arancel de este tipo no sirve para proteger el mercado nacional de la competencia internacional. De todas maneras, se considera que es poco probable que suceda.\u200B\u200B"@es . . . . . . . . . .