. . . . . . . . . "782"^^ . . . "Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community"@en . "Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 572 U.S. 782 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case examining whether a federal court has jurisdiction over activity that violates the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act but takes place off Indian lands, and, if so, whether tribal sovereign immunity prevents a state from suing in federal court. In a 5\u20134 decision, the Court held that the State of Michigan's suit against Bay Mills is barred by tribal immunity."@en . "Michigan, Petitioner v.Bay Mills Indian Communityet al."@en . . . "1080811983"^^ . . . . . . "10344"^^ . "Ginsburg"@en . . . . . . . . "2014"^^ . . . "572"^^ . "Scalia, Ginsburg, Alito"@en . . . "Kagan"@en . . . "2013"^^ . . . "Supreme Court"@en . . . "12"^^ . . "--12-02"^^ . . . . . "172800.0"^^ . "Michigan, Petitioner v. Bay Mills Indian Community et al."@en . . "--05-27"^^ . . . . . . . . . "Tribal sovereign immunity bars a lawsuit brought by the state against gaming off of Indian lands. Sixth Circuit affirmed."@en . . "Thomas"@en . . "Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 572 U.S. 782 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case examining whether a federal court has jurisdiction over activity that violates the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act but takes place off Indian lands, and, if so, whether tribal sovereign immunity prevents a state from suing in federal court. In a 5\u20134 decision, the Court held that the State of Michigan's suit against Bay Mills is barred by tribal immunity."@en . . . . . . . . . . . "Sotomayor"@en . . . . "Scalia"@en . . "25920.0"^^ . . . . . . . . . "42889761"^^ . "Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor"@en . "Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community"@en . . . . . ""@en . . . . . . . . . "Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community,"@en . "On remand, Bay Mills Indian Community v. Snyder, 720 F. App'x 754"@en .