. . . . . . . . . . "1997-02-15"^^ . . . "- Tonight with Trevor McDonald"@en . "Hastings, East Sussex, England"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\u0645\u0642\u062A\u0644 \u0628\u064A\u0644\u064A \u062C\u0648 \u062C\u064A\u0646\u064A\u0646\u063A\u0632"@ar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "right"@en . . . "Billie Jo Jenkins"@en . . . . . . . "Billie Jo Jenkins"@en . . "1997"^^ . . . "East London, England"@en . . . . . . . . . "1983-03-29"^^ . . . "30"^^ . . . . . . . . "Jenkins' subsequent behaviour raised further suspicion. While his foster daughter lay in a pool of blood inside, he went outside to raise the roof on his convertible car."@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Billie-Jo Margaret Jenkins (29 March 1983 \u2013 15 February 1997) was an English girl who was murdered in Hastings, East Sussex in February 1997. The case gained widespread media attention and remains unsolved. Her foster father, Si\u00F4n Jenkins, was originally convicted for the crime, but after two retrials in which the jury was unable to reach a verdict he was formally acquitted. He has been denied compensation on the grounds that there is no evidence to prove his innocence. He holds the rare distinction of having been acquitted despite never having been found not guilty by a jury. A second charge, relating to lies he had conceived about his qualifications in order to get his job as a deputy headteacher, was left to lie on file. Since his acquittal for murder, Sussex Police have maintained that"@en . . . . . . . . . . "Murder of Billie-Jo Jenkins"@en . . . "1983"^^ . "37790"^^ . . . "1123367712"^^ . . "3135146"^^ . . . . . . "Murder by beating"@en . . . "\u0628\u064A\u0644\u064A-\u062C\u0648 \u0645\u0627\u0631\u063A\u0631\u064A\u062A \u062C\u064A\u0646\u0643\u064A\u0646\u0632 (29 \u0645\u0627\u0631\u0633 1983 - 15 \u0641\u0628\u0631\u0627\u064A\u0631 1997) \u0643\u0627\u0646\u062A \u0641\u062A\u0627\u0629 \u0625\u0646\u062C\u0644\u064A\u0632\u064A\u0629 \u0642\u064F\u062A\u0644\u062A \u0641\u064A \u0647\u0627\u0633\u062A\u064A\u0646\u063A\u0632\u060C \u0634\u0631\u0642 \u0633\u0627\u0633\u0643\u0633 \u0641\u064A \u0641\u0628\u0631\u0627\u064A\u0631 1997. \u062D\u0638\u064A\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0636\u064A\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0647\u062A\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0625\u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064A \u0648\u0627\u0633\u0639 \u0648\u0644\u0627 \u062A\u0632\u0627\u0644 \u062F\u0648\u0646 \u062D\u0644."@ar . . . "\u0628\u064A\u0644\u064A-\u062C\u0648 \u0645\u0627\u0631\u063A\u0631\u064A\u062A \u062C\u064A\u0646\u0643\u064A\u0646\u0632 (29 \u0645\u0627\u0631\u0633 1983 - 15 \u0641\u0628\u0631\u0627\u064A\u0631 1997) \u0643\u0627\u0646\u062A \u0641\u062A\u0627\u0629 \u0625\u0646\u062C\u0644\u064A\u0632\u064A\u0629 \u0642\u064F\u062A\u0644\u062A \u0641\u064A \u0647\u0627\u0633\u062A\u064A\u0646\u063A\u0632\u060C \u0634\u0631\u0642 \u0633\u0627\u0633\u0643\u0633 \u0641\u064A \u0641\u0628\u0631\u0627\u064A\u0631 1997. \u062D\u0638\u064A\u062A \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0636\u064A\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0647\u062A\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0625\u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064A \u0648\u0627\u0633\u0639 \u0648\u0644\u0627 \u062A\u0632\u0627\u0644 \u062F\u0648\u0646 \u062D\u0644."@ar . . . "Billie-Jo Margaret Jenkins (29 March 1983 \u2013 15 February 1997) was an English girl who was murdered in Hastings, East Sussex in February 1997. The case gained widespread media attention and remains unsolved. Her foster father, Si\u00F4n Jenkins, was originally convicted for the crime, but after two retrials in which the jury was unable to reach a verdict he was formally acquitted. He has been denied compensation on the grounds that there is no evidence to prove his innocence. He holds the rare distinction of having been acquitted despite never having been found not guilty by a jury. A second charge, relating to lies he had conceived about his qualifications in order to get his job as a deputy headteacher, was left to lie on file. Since his acquittal for murder, Sussex Police have maintained that there are no plans to re-open the murder investigation. Billie-Jo's family have always maintained that Si\u00F4n Jenkins is guilty, and blamed the outcome of the final trial on the fact that the judge ruled inadmissible new forensic evidence due to it being introduced too late for the defence team to respond. The forensic evidence showed that the spots of blood found on Si\u00F4n's clothing also contained small fragments of Billie-Jo's bone and flesh, which appeared to disprove his claim that the blood had got there from her breathing out onto him as she died. It was this claim that had previously won Jenkins his re-trial. The forensic examination also found that the bloodspots contained tiny fragments of metal from the murder weapon, an iron tent peg. In January 2022, it was announced that police were re-examining the forensic evidence. Her killing is one of Britain's most high-profile unsolved murders."@en . . . . . . . "1983-03-29"^^ . . . . . "1997-02-15"^^ . .