. . "Catholic"@en . . "Restituto (fl. 314) era um bispo , provavelmente de Lond\u00EDnio (atual Londres), uma das delega\u00E7\u00F5es brit\u00E2nicas que participou do s\u00EDnodo da igreja ou do Conselho realizado em Arles (Arelate), na G\u00E1lia, em 314. A maioria das autoridades sugeriu a emiss\u00E3o de \"Col\u00F4nia Londen\u00EAnsio\" para \"Col\u00F4nia Lind\u00EAnsio\" - a col\u00F4nia do povo de Lindo (Lincoln)."@pt . . . . . . "Restituto (fl. 314) era um bispo , provavelmente de Lond\u00EDnio (atual Londres), uma das delega\u00E7\u00F5es brit\u00E2nicas que participou do s\u00EDnodo da igreja ou do Conselho realizado em Arles (Arelate), na G\u00E1lia, em 314. A lista dos que assinaram o Acta, as decis\u00F5es tomadas pelo Conselho, inclu\u00EDa tr\u00EAs bispos, juntamente com um \"presb\u00EDtero\" e um \"di\u00E1cono\", da Gr\u00E3-Bretanha. Os bispos brit\u00E2nicos eram Eb\u00F3rio \"da cividade de Eboraco\" (de civitate Eboricensi) - da cidade de Eboraco (Iorque); Restituto \"da cidadade de Lond\u00EDnio\" (de civitate Londenensi) - da cidade de Lond\u00EDnio (atual Londres); e Ad\u00E9lfio \"da cividade da Col\u00F4nia Londen\u00EAnsio\" (de civitate Colonia Londenensium) - isto \u00E9, da \"col\u00F4nia romana do povo de Lond\u00EDnio\". O texto, que sobrevive apenas em v\u00E1rias c\u00F3pias manuscritas posteriores, \u00E9 claramente corrupto ao designar dois bispos para Londres. Como Londres n\u00E3o era uma col\u00F4nia, a suspeita caiu no local de origem de Ad\u00E9lfio, bispo da \"col\u00F4nia do povo de Lond\u00EDnio\". A maioria das autoridades sugeriu a emiss\u00E3o de \"Col\u00F4nia Londen\u00EAnsio\" para \"Col\u00F4nia Lind\u00EAnsio\" - a col\u00F4nia do povo de Lindo (Lincoln). No entanto, S.N. Miller considerou que a palavra \"col\u00F4nia\" tamb\u00E9m era suspeita; ele ressaltou que, embora muitas outras col\u00F4nias tenham enviado bispos a Arles, entre eles Col\u00F4nia, Tr\u00E9veris e Li\u00E3o, nenhuma havia sido designada \"col\u00F4nia\" na lista. Miller argumentou que de civitate Colonia Londenensium foi um erro para \"de civitate Camu/lodunensium\" - \"a cidade do povo de Camuloduno\" (Colchester). Esta vis\u00E3o foi apoiada pelo arque\u00F3logo Sir . Outros identificaram Ad\u00E9lfio como bispo de Caerleon-on-Usk. Apesar do debate sobre o papel de Ad\u00E9lfio, parece mais prov\u00E1vel que a identifica\u00E7\u00E3o de Restituto como bispo de Londres estivesse correta. No entanto, n\u00E3o mais se sabe sobre ele, nem sobre seus antecessores e sucessores do Romano-brit\u00E2nica da s\u00E9 de Londres. Seu nome n\u00E3o aparece na lista dos supostos \"arcebispos de Londres\" que o historiador do s\u00E9culo XVI John Stow atribuiu a . O pr\u00F3prio Stow notou essa anomalia e o fato de Restituto ter sido listado como bispo e n\u00E3o como arcebispo; isso, ele sentiu, colocou em d\u00FAvida a autenticidade da lista de arcebispos. Escritores posteriores tentaram reconciliar as duas fontes, geralmente inserindo Restituto na lista de \"Jocelin\", entre Hilarius e Guitelinus, ou depois de Guitelinus."@pt . . "1114717338"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . "unknown"@en . "Restituto de Lond\u00EDnio"@pt . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Restitutus"@en . . . . "Restitutus (fl.\u2009314) was a Romano-British bishop, probably from Londinium (London), one of the British delegation who attended the church synod or Council held at Arles (Arelate), in Gaul, in AD 314. The list of those who signed the Acta, the decisions made by the council, included three bishops, along with a \"presbyter\" and a \"deacon\", from Britain. The British bishops were Eborius \"de civitate Eboricensi\" \u2013 from the city of Eboracum (York); Restitutus \"de civitate Londenensi\" \u2013 from the city of Londinium (London); and Adelfius \"de civitate Colonia Londenensium\" \u2013 from the \"colonia of the people of London\". The text, which survives only in a number of later manuscript copies, is clearly corrupt in assigning two bishops to London. Since London was not a colonia, most authorities have agreed that Adelfius' see is misrecorded, with proposed alternatives including Lindum (Lincoln) or Camulodunum (Colchester). Notwithstanding the debate about the role of Adelfius, it seems most probable that the identification of Restitutus as Bishop of London was correct. However, no more is known about him, nor about his predecessors and successors in the Romano-British see of London. His name does not appear in the list of supposed early \"Archbishops of London\" that the 16th-century historian John Stow attributed to Jocelin of Furness. Stow himself noted this anomaly, and the fact that Restitutus was listed as a bishop and not an archbishop; this, he felt, cast doubt on the authenticity of the list of archbishops. Later writers attempted to reconcile the two sources, usually by inserting Restitutus into \"Jocelin's\" list, either between Hilarius and Guitelinus, or after Guitelinus."@en . . . . . . . . "unknown"@en . . . . "Restitutus (fl.\u2009314) was a Romano-British bishop, probably from Londinium (London), one of the British delegation who attended the church synod or Council held at Arles (Arelate), in Gaul, in AD 314. The list of those who signed the Acta, the decisions made by the council, included three bishops, along with a \"presbyter\" and a \"deacon\", from Britain. The British bishops were Eborius \"de civitate Eboricensi\" \u2013 from the city of Eboracum (York); Restitutus \"de civitate Londenensi\" \u2013 from the city of Londinium (London); and Adelfius \"de civitate Colonia Londenensium\" \u2013 from the \"colonia of the people of London\"."@en . . . . . . . . . . "Restitutus"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "5501"^^ . . . . . . "12577043"^^ . "Bishop of London?"@en . . . . "Restitutus"@en . . . .