. . . . . . . . . "\u0421\u043F\u043E\u0440 \u0417\u0438\u0431\u0435\u043B\u044F \u2014 \u0424\u0438\u043A\u0435\u0440\u0430 (\u043D\u0435\u043C. Sybel-Ficker-Streit) \u2014 \u0441\u043F\u043E\u0440 \u0432\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u0439 \u043F\u043E\u043B\u043E\u0432\u0438\u043D\u044B XIX \u0432. \u043C\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u043D\u0435\u043C\u0435\u0446\u043A\u0438\u043C\u0438 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0438\u043A\u0430\u043C\u0438 \u0413\u0435\u043D\u0440\u0438\u0445\u043E\u043C \u0444\u043E\u043D \u0417\u0438\u0431\u0435\u043B\u0435\u043C \u0438 \u042E\u043B\u0438\u0443\u0441\u043E\u043C \u0444\u043E\u043D \u0424\u0438\u043A\u0435\u0440\u043E\u043C. \u0412\u043A\u043B\u044E\u0447\u0430\u043B \u0432 \u0441\u0435\u0431\u044F \u0434\u0438\u0441\u043A\u0443\u0441\u0441\u0438\u044E \u043E \u0432\u043D\u0435\u0448\u043D\u0435\u0439 \u043F\u043E\u043B\u0438\u0442\u0438\u043A\u0435 \u0421\u0432\u044F\u0449\u0435\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0420\u0438\u043C\u0441\u043A\u043E\u0439 \u0438\u043C\u043F\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0438, \u043E\u0442\u043D\u043E\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u044F\u0445 \u043C\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u043D\u0435\u0439 \u0438 \u043F\u0430\u043F\u0441\u043A\u0438\u043C \u043F\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043E\u043B\u043E\u043C. \u0418\u043C\u0435\u043B\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043D\u043E\u0435 \u0437\u043D\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u043B\u044F \u0433\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0441\u043A\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0432\u043E\u043F\u0440\u043E\u0441\u0430 \u2014 \u0434\u043E\u043B\u0436\u043D\u0430 \u043B\u0438 \u0410\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0438\u044F \u0431\u044B\u0442\u044C \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u044C\u044E \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u043E\u0431\u044A\u0435\u0434\u0438\u043D\u0451\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0413\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0438\u0438 (\u0412\u0435\u043B\u0438\u043A\u043E\u0433\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0441\u043A\u0438\u0439 \u043F\u0443\u0442\u044C, \u0424\u0438\u043A\u0435\u0440), \u0438\u043B\u0438 \u0413\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0438\u044F \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0442 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0434\u043E\u043B\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044C\u0441\u044F \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0410\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438 (\u043A\u0430\u043A \u043C\u0430\u043B\u043E\u0433\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0441\u043A\u0438\u0439, \u0417\u0438\u0431\u0435\u043B\u044C)."@ru . . . . . . . "Controversia Sybel-Ficker"@it . . . "Sybel-Ficker controversy"@en . . . "The Sybel-Ficker controversy (German: Sybel-Ficker-Streit) is the name given to a dispute in the second half of the 19th century between the historians Heinrich von Sybel (1817\u20131895) and Julius von Ficker (1826\u20131902). It involved a discussion concerning relations between Rome (that is, the papal see) and the Holy Roman Empire, which also had an important bearing on the Austria\u2013Prussia rivalry\u2014whether Austria was to be part of a federal Germany, or whether Germany would continue without Austria (as a Lesser Germany)."@en . . . . . "https://web.archive.org/web/20100609103940/http://www.zeitreisen-blog.de/2010/05/25/historikerstreit-im-19-jahrhundert-die-sybel-ficker-kontroverse/|text=Historikerstreit im 19. Jahrhundert: Die Sybel-Ficker-Kontroverse"@en . "13938"^^ . . "Der Sybel-Ficker-Streit ist nach einer Auseinandersetzung zwischen den beiden Historikern Heinrich von Sybel (1817\u20131895) und Julius Ficker (1826\u20131902) benannt. \u00DCber den fachwissenschaftlichen Diskurs im engeren Sinn hinaus war der Streit f\u00FCr die allgemeine Debatte zwischen den Verfechtern einer gro\u00DFdeutschen und einer kleindeutsch-preu\u00DFischen L\u00F6sung der deutschen Frage von gro\u00DFer Bedeutung. Es ging n\u00E4mlich darum, zu kl\u00E4ren, ob \u00D6sterreich zu dem angestrebten deutschen Nationalstaat hinzugeh\u00F6ren sollte oder ob man sich \u201Ekleindeutsch\u201C, das hei\u00DFt auf einen von Preu\u00DFen dominierten Nationalstaat beschr\u00E4nken wollte. Heinrich von Sybel gab den Ansto\u00DF zur Kontroverse, als er 1859 in einer Rede die mittelalterliche Kaiserpolitik der Italienz\u00FCge als \u201Eunnational\u201C verurteilte. Julius Ficker widersprach Sybel 1861 in Vorlesungen an der Universit\u00E4t Innsbruck und rechtfertigte die Kaiser in ihrer universalen und zugleich \u201Anationalen\u2018 Reichspolitik. W\u00E4hrend Sybel eine \u201Ekleindeutsch-norddeutsch-protestantische Geschichtsauffassung\u201C vertrat, sprach der aus Paderborn geb\u00FCrtige Katholik Ficker aus gro\u00DFdeutscher Perspektive, in die \u00D6sterreich nationalstaatlich einbezogen war."@de . . . . "54952806"^^ . . "The Sybel-Ficker controversy (German: Sybel-Ficker-Streit) is the name given to a dispute in the second half of the 19th century between the historians Heinrich von Sybel (1817\u20131895) and Julius von Ficker (1826\u20131902). It involved a discussion concerning relations between Rome (that is, the papal see) and the Holy Roman Empire, which also had an important bearing on the Austria\u2013Prussia rivalry\u2014whether Austria was to be part of a federal Germany, or whether Germany would continue without Austria (as a Lesser Germany). Heinrich von Sybel fired the first shot in the dispute in an 1859 lecture, in which he condemned the medieval politics of the German Empire as \"unnational\". Julius Ficker countered in 1861 in lectures at the University of Innsbruck, in which he justified the emperors' national politics, which he also presented as universal. While Sybel's was a \"kleindeutsch-norddeutsch-protestantische\" (Little German-North German-Protestant) concept of history, Ficker promoted a Greater Germany which would include Austria."@en . "La disputa Sybel-Ficker prende il nome da una disputa tra i due storici (1817-1895) e Julius Ficker (1826-1902). Al di l\u00E0 del discorso erudito in senso stretto, la disputa fu di grande importanza per il dibattito generale tra i sostenitori di una soluzione della Grande Germania e tra i sostenitori di una Piccola Germania-Prussia alla questione tedesca. Si trattava cio\u00E8 di chiarire se l'Austria doveva far parte dell'auspicato stato nazionale tedesco o se si voleva rimanere \"piccolo tedesco\", cio\u00E8 limitato a uno stato nazionale dominato dalla Prussia. Heinrich von Sybel cominci\u00F2 la diatriba quando, in un discorso del 1859, condann\u00F2 come \u201Canazionale\u201D la politica imperiale medievale degli Italienzug. Julius Ficker respinse la tesi di Sybel nelle sue lezioni presso l'Universit\u00E0 di Innsbruck nel 1861 giustific\u00F2 gli imperatori nella loro politica imperiale universale e allo stesso tempo \"nazionale\". Mentre Sybel rappresentava \"visione piccol-tedesca del nord di matrice protestante della storia\", Ficker, un cattolico nato a Paderborn, parlava da una grande prospettiva tedesca, in cui l'Austria era inclusa come stato-nazione."@it . . . . . . . . . "\u0421\u043F\u043E\u0440 \u0417\u0438\u0431\u0435\u043B\u044F \u2014 \u0424\u0438\u043A\u0435\u0440\u0430 (\u043D\u0435\u043C. Sybel-Ficker-Streit) \u2014 \u0441\u043F\u043E\u0440 \u0432\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u0439 \u043F\u043E\u043B\u043E\u0432\u0438\u043D\u044B XIX \u0432. \u043C\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u043D\u0435\u043C\u0435\u0446\u043A\u0438\u043C\u0438 \u0438\u0441\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0438\u043A\u0430\u043C\u0438 \u0413\u0435\u043D\u0440\u0438\u0445\u043E\u043C \u0444\u043E\u043D \u0417\u0438\u0431\u0435\u043B\u0435\u043C \u0438 \u042E\u043B\u0438\u0443\u0441\u043E\u043C \u0444\u043E\u043D \u0424\u0438\u043A\u0435\u0440\u043E\u043C. \u0412\u043A\u043B\u044E\u0447\u0430\u043B \u0432 \u0441\u0435\u0431\u044F \u0434\u0438\u0441\u043A\u0443\u0441\u0441\u0438\u044E \u043E \u0432\u043D\u0435\u0448\u043D\u0435\u0439 \u043F\u043E\u043B\u0438\u0442\u0438\u043A\u0435 \u0421\u0432\u044F\u0449\u0435\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0420\u0438\u043C\u0441\u043A\u043E\u0439 \u0438\u043C\u043F\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0438, \u043E\u0442\u043D\u043E\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u044F\u0445 \u043C\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u043D\u0435\u0439 \u0438 \u043F\u0430\u043F\u0441\u043A\u0438\u043C \u043F\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043E\u043B\u043E\u043C. \u0418\u043C\u0435\u043B\u0430 \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043D\u043E\u0435 \u0437\u043D\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u043B\u044F \u0433\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0441\u043A\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0432\u043E\u043F\u0440\u043E\u0441\u0430 \u2014 \u0434\u043E\u043B\u0436\u043D\u0430 \u043B\u0438 \u0410\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0438\u044F \u0431\u044B\u0442\u044C \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u044C\u044E \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u043E\u0431\u044A\u0435\u0434\u0438\u043D\u0451\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0413\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0438\u0438 (\u0412\u0435\u043B\u0438\u043A\u043E\u0433\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0441\u043A\u0438\u0439 \u043F\u0443\u0442\u044C, \u0424\u0438\u043A\u0435\u0440), \u0438\u043B\u0438 \u0413\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0438\u044F \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0442 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0434\u043E\u043B\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044C\u0441\u044F \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u0410\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438 (\u043A\u0430\u043A \u043C\u0430\u043B\u043E\u0433\u0435\u0440\u043C\u0430\u043D\u0441\u043A\u0438\u0439, \u0417\u0438\u0431\u0435\u043B\u044C)."@ru . . . "\u0421\u043F\u043E\u0440 \u0417\u0438\u0431\u0435\u043B\u044F \u2014 \u0424\u0438\u043A\u0435\u0440\u0430"@ru . "1120017527"^^ . "Sybel-Ficker-Streit"@de . "Der Sybel-Ficker-Streit ist nach einer Auseinandersetzung zwischen den beiden Historikern Heinrich von Sybel (1817\u20131895) und Julius Ficker (1826\u20131902) benannt. \u00DCber den fachwissenschaftlichen Diskurs im engeren Sinn hinaus war der Streit f\u00FCr die allgemeine Debatte zwischen den Verfechtern einer gro\u00DFdeutschen und einer kleindeutsch-preu\u00DFischen L\u00F6sung der deutschen Frage von gro\u00DFer Bedeutung. Es ging n\u00E4mlich darum, zu kl\u00E4ren, ob \u00D6sterreich zu dem angestrebten deutschen Nationalstaat hinzugeh\u00F6ren sollte oder ob man sich \u201Ekleindeutsch\u201C, das hei\u00DFt auf einen von Preu\u00DFen dominierten Nationalstaat beschr\u00E4nken wollte."@de . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "2010-06-09"^^ . . . . . . "La disputa Sybel-Ficker prende il nome da una disputa tra i due storici (1817-1895) e Julius Ficker (1826-1902). Al di l\u00E0 del discorso erudito in senso stretto, la disputa fu di grande importanza per il dibattito generale tra i sostenitori di una soluzione della Grande Germania e tra i sostenitori di una Piccola Germania-Prussia alla questione tedesca. Si trattava cio\u00E8 di chiarire se l'Austria doveva far parte dell'auspicato stato nazionale tedesco o se si voleva rimanere \"piccolo tedesco\", cio\u00E8 limitato a uno stato nazionale dominato dalla Prussia."@it .