. . "8192"^^ . "Icelandic Transient"@en . . "c. December 1981"@en . . . "17280.0"^^ . "Male"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises, five orcas, by their Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., Richard \"Ric\" O'Barry, Ingrid N. Visser, Ph.D., Howard Garrrett, Samantha Berg, and Carol Ray, Plaintiffs, v. Sea World Parks & Entertainment, Inc. and Sea World, LLC, Defendants"@en . . . . . . . "41091875"^^ . . . . . "Tilikum v. Sea World"@en . . "2017-01-06"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . "Orcinus orca"@en . . . . . . "Tilikum v. Sea World (Tilikum et al. v. Sea World Parks & Entertainment Inc., 842 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (S.D. Cal. 2012)) was a legal case heard in the US Federal Court in 2012 concerning the constitutional standing of an orca. It was brought by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) on behalf of Tilikum, an orca kept in the SeaWorld Orlando park, against the SeaWorld corporation. The plaintiff asked the court to rule that the terms of the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution applied to Tilikum, and thus that the orca's confinement amounted to involuntary servitude or slavery. The court held that the Thirteenth Amendment only applied to persons and that Tilikum was not a person, and so was not afforded constitutional protections."@en . "Tilikum v. Sea World (Tilikum et al. v. Sea World Parks & Entertainment Inc., 842 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (S.D. Cal. 2012)) was a legal case heard in the US Federal Court in 2012 concerning the constitutional standing of an orca. It was brought by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) on behalf of Tilikum, an orca kept in the SeaWorld Orlando park, against the SeaWorld corporation."@en . "Tilikum"@en . . . . . . "1110805032"^^ . . "Tilikum during a performance at SeaWorld in 2009"@en . "--02-08"^^ . . "2012"^^ .