. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "The elm cultivar Ulmus 'Turkestanica' was first described by Regel as U. turkestanica in Dieck, Hauptcat. Baumschul. Z\u00F6schen (1883) and in Gartenflora (1884). Regel himself stressed that \"U. turkestanica was only a preliminary name given by me; I regard this as a form of U. suberosa\" [:U. minor ]. Litvinov (Schedae ad Herbarium Florae Rossicae, 1908) considered U. turkestanica Regel a variety of his U. densa (now considered in Russia a form of field elm), adding that its fruits were \"like those of U. foliacea Gilibert\" [:U. minor]. 'Turkestanica' was distributed in Europe as U. turkestanica Regel by the Sp\u00E4th nursery of Berlin from c.1890, in whose catalogues it was listed separately from U. pinnato-ramosa, now U. pumila 'Pinnato-ramosa', and from U. campestris umbraculifera, with both of which it was later confused \u2013 the former by Elwes and Henry, the latter (as U. 'Turkestanica') by Green."@en . . . . . . "52250128"^^ . . . . "Ulmus 'Turkestanica'"@en . "13041"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "1113698554"^^ . . "'Turkestanica'"@en . . "Ulmus 'Turkestanica'"@en . . . "Ulmus 'Turkestanica'"@en . . . "The elm cultivar Ulmus 'Turkestanica' was first described by Regel as U. turkestanica in Dieck, Hauptcat. Baumschul. Z\u00F6schen (1883) and in Gartenflora (1884). Regel himself stressed that \"U. turkestanica was only a preliminary name given by me; I regard this as a form of U. suberosa\" [:U. minor ]. Litvinov (Schedae ad Herbarium Florae Rossicae, 1908) considered U. turkestanica Regel a variety of his U. densa (now considered in Russia a form of field elm), adding that its fruits were \"like those of U. foliacea Gilibert\" [:U. minor]."@en . . . . . . . . . . "Ulmus"@en . . . .