. . "0.32"^^ . . . "Annual investment in water supply and sanitation"@en . "36"^^ . . . "US$2 billion or US$20/capita"@en . . "1118176744"^^ . . . "45"^^ . "Water and Sanitation in Mexico"@en . . . . . . . . "National water and sanitation company"@en . . "Water and sanitation regulator"@en . . . . . "Institutions"@en . . . . . "2517"^^ . "Yes , with a focus on water resources"@en . "8354659"^^ . . . . . "Share of collected wastewater treated"@en . "Si bien M\u00E9xico se precia de tener algunos de los mejores organismos operadores de agua potable y saneamiento de Am\u00E9rica Latina[cita requerida], tambi\u00E9n cuenta con algunos cuyo desempe\u00F1o es deplorable. El acceso, la eficiencia y la calidad de los servicios de agua y saneamiento var\u00EDan mucho de una localidad a la otra, reflejando en gran medida los diferentes niveles de desarrollo en todo el pa\u00EDs. En general, el sector de agua y saneamiento mexicano est\u00E1 marcado por los siguientes problemas:"@es . . "96.0"^^ . . . . "Si bien M\u00E9xico se precia de tener algunos de los mejores organismos operadores de agua potable y saneamiento de Am\u00E9rica Latina[cita requerida], tambi\u00E9n cuenta con algunos cuyo desempe\u00F1o es deplorable. El acceso, la eficiencia y la calidad de los servicios de agua y saneamiento var\u00EDan mucho de una localidad a la otra, reflejando en gran medida los diferentes niveles de desarrollo en todo el pa\u00EDs. En general, el sector de agua y saneamiento mexicano est\u00E1 marcado por los siguientes problemas: \n* Baja eficiencia t\u00E9cnica y comercial en la prestaci\u00F3n de los servicios. \n* Calidad inadecuada de los servicios de abastecimiento de agua. \n* Calidad deficiente de los servicios de saneamiento, especialmente en lo que respecta al tratamiento de aguas residuales. \n* Cobertura insuficiente en las zonas rurales m\u00E1s pobres."@es . . "Share of customer metering"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Average urban water tariff"@en . . . . . . . "n/a"@en . "69"^^ . . . . . . "Number of urban service providers"@en . . . . "Water supply and sanitation in Mexico"@en . . . "Agua potable y saneamiento en M\u00E9xico"@es . . . "National Water Commission"@en . . . "Sector law"@en . . "85.0"^^ . . . . . . "No"@en . . . . . "173"^^ . "Water supply and sanitation in Mexico is characterized by achievements and challenges. Among the achievements is a significant increase in access to piped water supply in urban areas (88% to 93%) as well as in rural areas (50% to 74%) between 1990 and 2010. Additionally, a strong nationwide increase in access to improved sanitation (64% to 85%) was observed in the same period. Other achievements include the existence of a functioning national system to finance water and sanitation infrastructure with a National Water Commission as its apex institution; and the existence of a few well-performing utilities such as Aguas y Drenaje de Monterrey."@en . . . "Responsibility for policy setting"@en . . . . "background:lightblue"@en . . "text-align:left"@en . . . . "Widespread, except for some states, since 1983"@en . . . . . . "Decentralization to municipalities"@en . . . . "Average urban water use"@en . . . . . . . . "53002"^^ . . "Access to an improved water source"@en . . . . . . . . . . . "Water supply and sanitation in Mexico is characterized by achievements and challenges. Among the achievements is a significant increase in access to piped water supply in urban areas (88% to 93%) as well as in rural areas (50% to 74%) between 1990 and 2010. Additionally, a strong nationwide increase in access to improved sanitation (64% to 85%) was observed in the same period. Other achievements include the existence of a functioning national system to finance water and sanitation infrastructure with a National Water Commission as its apex institution; and the existence of a few well-performing utilities such as Aguas y Drenaje de Monterrey. The challenges include water scarcity in the northern and central parts of the country; inadequate water service quality (drinking water quality; 55% of Mexicans receiving water only intermittently according to results of the 2000 census); poor technical and commercial efficiency of most utilities (with an average level of non-revenue water of 51% in 2003); an insufficient share of wastewater receiving treatment (36% in 2006); and still inadequate access in rural areas. In addition to on-going investments to expand access, the government has embarked on a large investment program to improve wastewater treatment."@en . . . "Data"@en . . . . . "Access to improved sanitation"@en . "Investment financing"@en . . . . . . . . "Continuity of supply"@en . . . . . . . "Number of rural service providers"@en . "58"^^ .