Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), required schools to provide students an education that is "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances." In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court vacated the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1 (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), required schools to provide students an education that is "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances." In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court vacated the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Endrew F., a minor, by and through his parents and next friends, Joseph F. et al. v. Douglas County School District RE-1 (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
docket
| |
JoinMajority
| |
LawsApplied
| - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, et seq. (en)
|
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - (en)
- 25920.0 (second)
- Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, No. 12-CV-02620-LTB (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Endrew F., a minor, by and through his parents and next friends, Joseph F. et al. v. Douglas County School District RE-1 (en)
|
Holding
| - To meet its substantive obligation under the IDEA, a school must offer an Individualized Education Program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacated and remanded. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1 (en)
|
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), required schools to provide students an education that is "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances." In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court vacated the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The central issue in the case was about "the level of educational benefit school districts must provide students with disabilities as defined by IDEA. The Supreme Court held that the proper standard under the IDEA "is markedly more demanding than the 'merely more than de minimis' test applied by the Tenth Circuit." The Court added that meaningful, "appropriately ambitious" progress goes further than what the lower courts had held. The Court, however, rejected a stricter equal access or equal opportunity standard for a free and appropriate education proposed by the plaintiff. The case was described by advocates as "the most significant special-education issue to reach the high court in three decades." (en)
|
Procedural
| - On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |