About: Grant v Australian Knitting Mills

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FGrant_v_Australian_Knitting_Mills

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills, is a landmark case in consumer and negligence law from 1935, holding that where a manufacturer knows that a consumer may be injured if the manufacturer does not take reasonable care, the manufacturer owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care. It continues to be cited as an authority in legal cases, and used as an example for students studying law.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (en) Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (ga)
rdfs:comment	Grant v Australian Knitting Mills, is a landmark case in consumer and negligence law from 1935, holding that where a manufacturer knows that a consumer may be injured if the manufacturer does not take reasonable care, the manufacturer owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care. It continues to be cited as an authority in legal cases, and used as an example for students studying law. (en) Sa chás Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 562, rialaíodh go raibh an a fógraíodh trí bliana roimhe sin i , 1933, ina phrionsabal cuid mhór ní ba leithne ná mar a tuigeadh go dtí sin. Thug an Ríchomhairle a breithiúnas sa chás ar 21 Deireadh Fómhair 1936. (ga)
name	Australian Knitting Mills Limited v Grant (en) Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	1936 in the United Kingdom Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Australia Trousers and shorts 1936 in Australian law High Court of Australia cases Product liability case law Australian tort case law 1936 in case law
Wikipage page ID	19065082 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1118576424 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Calamine Robert Wright, Baron Wright Privity of contract 1936 in the United Kingdom Dermatitis Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Duty of care Strict liability Lord Atkin Negligence Edward McTiernan George John Robert Murray Lord Chancellor Commonwealth Law Reports Hayden Starke Lancelot Sanderson Owen Dixon Judicial functions of the House of Lords H. V. Evatt High Court of Australia Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Australia Trousers and shorts 1936 in Australian law High Court of Australia cases Product liability case law John Roberts Australian tort case law John Martin & Co. Sulphite Supreme Court of South Australia George v Skivington Winterbottom v Wright Donoghue v Stevenson Douglas Hogg, 1st Viscount Hailsham 1936 in case law Postmaster General of the United Kingdom Hugh Macmillan, Baron Macmillan Appeal Cases Law Reports Robert Younger, Baron Blanesburgh Wilfred Greene, 1st Baron Greene Exchequer of Pleas William Watson, Baron Thankerton Consumer law South Australian State Reports Justices dbr:Langridge_v_Levy
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/1933/35.pdf http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121003063309/http%3A/www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/navless/cedric/cedric.asp%3FitemID%3D181268
sameAs	Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Grant v Australian Knitting Mills
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Post-nominals dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300
citations	; (en)
court	Judicial Committee of the Privy Council High Court of Australia
full name	Australian Knitting Mills Ltd and John Martin & Co v Grant (en)
imagesize	100 (xsd:integer)
judges	Robert Wright, Baron Wright Lord Chancellor Lancelot Sanderson Douglas Hogg, 1st Viscount Hailsham Hugh Macmillan, Baron Macmillan Robert Younger, Baron Blanesburgh Starke, Dixon, Evatt and McTiernan JJ (en)
has abstract	Grant v Australian Knitting Mills, is a landmark case in consumer and negligence law from 1935, holding that where a manufacturer knows that a consumer may be injured if the manufacturer does not take reasonable care, the manufacturer owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care. It continues to be cited as an authority in legal cases, and used as an example for students studying law. (en) Sa chás Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 562, rialaíodh go raibh an a fógraíodh trí bliana roimhe sin i , 1933, ina phrionsabal cuid mhór ní ba leithne ná mar a tuigeadh go dtí sin. Thug an Ríchomhairle a breithiúnas sa chás ar 21 Deireadh Fómhair 1936. (ga)
date decided	1933-08-18 (xsd:date) 1935-10-21 (xsd:date)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Grant_v_Australian_Knitting_Mills?oldid=1118576424&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	21572 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Grant_v_Australian_Knitting_Mills
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Robert Wright, Baron Wright 1935 Negligence

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software