Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young. The case was an important precedent for aboriginal title in the United States and sovereign immunity in the United States.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young. The case was an important precedent for aboriginal title in the United States and sovereign immunity in the United States. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, etc., et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
Subsequent
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| - Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, etc., et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - The Tribe's suit is not covered by the Ex parte Young exception to state immunity from suit. (en)
|
Litigants
| - Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho (en)
|
majority
| |
has abstract
| - Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young. The case was an important precedent for aboriginal title in the United States and sovereign immunity in the United States. After the district court's decision dismissing the suit, the federal government—in its guardian capacity—brought a substantially similar suit against Idaho; in 2001, in another 5–4 decision, the Court ruled for the federal government: Idaho v. United States (2001). (en)
|
Concurrence
| - Kennedy (en)
- O'Connor (en)
|
JoinConcurrence
| - Rehnquist (en)
- Scalia, Thomas (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is rdfs:seeAlso
of | |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |