• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:SpeechAct107160883, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: yago:WikicatWomen'sRightsInReligiousMovementsyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Abstraction105854150yago:Act100030358yago:Case107308889yago:Cognition100023271yago:Concept105835747yago:Content105809192yago:Controversy107183151yago:Disagreement107180787yago:Dispute107181935yago:Event100029378yago:Happening107283608yago:Idea105833840yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:WikicatIslam-relatedControversiesInAsiayago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:Right105174653yago:SpeechAct107160883 New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Mohd. Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum [1985 (1) SCALE 767 = 1985 (3) SCR 844 = 1985 (2) SCC 556 = AIR 1985 SC 945], commonly referred to as the Shah Bano case, was a controversial maintenance lawsuit in India, in which the Supreme Court delivered a judgment favouring maintenance given to an aggrieved divorced Muslim woman. Then the Congress government enacted a law with its most controversial aspect being the right to maintenance for the period of iddat after the divorce, and shifting the onus of maintaining her to her relatives or the Waqf Board. It was seen as discriminatory as it denied right to basic maintenance available to Muslim women under secular law.