Since 2017, a series of protests against judiciary reforms have occurred in Poland. Since Law and Justice took power in Poland in 2015, its influence rapidly extended to the judicial branch, through contended nominations that produced the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis. The Law and Justice party argues that the reforms are needed to improve the efficiency of the judiciary, but the opposition, supported by a significant number of members of the judiciary, has been very critical of the reforms. The reforms have also been criticized by a number of international bodies. The European Commission invokes the Article 7 of the European Treaty against E.U. member Poland, denouncing recent judiciary reforms putting it under the political control of the ruling majority and citing "serious ris
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - Manifestations en Pologne (2017) (fr)
- Protesty przeciwko zmianom w sądownictwie w Polsce (pl)
- Protests against Polish judiciary reforms (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Manifestations pour la défense des Tribunaux - vague de manifestations populaires qui a commencé en 2017 après la modification par la 8e législature de la Diète de Pologne de plusieurs lois : sur le Conseil supérieur de la magistrature (CSM), sur le fonctionnement de l'ordre judiciaire, et sur la Cour Suprême (CS). (fr)
- Protesty przeciwko zmianom w sądownictwie – zorganizowane protesty społeczne, które rozpoczęły się w 2017 po uchwaleniu w Sejmie VIII kadencji przez posłów rządzących partii (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, Solidarna Polska i Porozumienie Jarosława Gowina) nowelizacji ustaw: o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa oraz ustawy – Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych, a także ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym. (pl)
- Since 2017, a series of protests against judiciary reforms have occurred in Poland. Since Law and Justice took power in Poland in 2015, its influence rapidly extended to the judicial branch, through contended nominations that produced the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis. The Law and Justice party argues that the reforms are needed to improve the efficiency of the judiciary, but the opposition, supported by a significant number of members of the judiciary, has been very critical of the reforms. The reforms have also been criticized by a number of international bodies. The European Commission invokes the Article 7 of the European Treaty against E.U. member Poland, denouncing recent judiciary reforms putting it under the political control of the ruling majority and citing "serious ris (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
has abstract
| - Since 2017, a series of protests against judiciary reforms have occurred in Poland. Since Law and Justice took power in Poland in 2015, its influence rapidly extended to the judicial branch, through contended nominations that produced the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis. The Law and Justice party argues that the reforms are needed to improve the efficiency of the judiciary, but the opposition, supported by a significant number of members of the judiciary, has been very critical of the reforms. The reforms have also been criticized by a number of international bodies. The European Commission invokes the Article 7 of the European Treaty against E.U. member Poland, denouncing recent judiciary reforms putting it under the political control of the ruling majority and citing "serious risk [to] the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers". The Polish judicial disciplinary panel law, approved by the Sejm on 20 December 2019. The bill empowers the Disciplinary Chamber at the Supreme Court of Poland to punish judges who engage in "political activity", including questioning the political independence of the panel. Punishment of judges may be a fine, reduction of salary, or termination from their position. The bill also changes the manner in which the head of the Supreme Court of Poland is appointed. Giving the government, in effect, the ability to control and sack judges the legislation violates EU judicial system legislation. Donald Tusk warned the bill might force Poland out of the EU. The Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Committee for the Defence of Democracy organized protests throughout Poland against the bill. In February 2020, former Constitutional Tribunal judges, including former Constitutional Tribunal presidents Andrzej Rzepliński (2010-2016), , , , and Andrzej Zoll described the tribunal as having "virtually been abolished". By 2020, fourteen out of the fifteen judges had been appointed to the Constitutional Tribunal by the Sejm since the return in power of PiS in 2015, which was seen by the former tribunal presidents and judges as one of the signs of a lack of checks and balances against PiS' domination of three branches of government power. (en)
- Manifestations pour la défense des Tribunaux - vague de manifestations populaires qui a commencé en 2017 après la modification par la 8e législature de la Diète de Pologne de plusieurs lois : sur le Conseil supérieur de la magistrature (CSM), sur le fonctionnement de l'ordre judiciaire, et sur la Cour Suprême (CS). (fr)
- Protesty przeciwko zmianom w sądownictwie – zorganizowane protesty społeczne, które rozpoczęły się w 2017 po uchwaleniu w Sejmie VIII kadencji przez posłów rządzących partii (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, Solidarna Polska i Porozumienie Jarosława Gowina) nowelizacji ustaw: o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa oraz ustawy – Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych, a także ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym. (pl)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is rdfs:seeAlso
of | |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |