About: R v Miller

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Miller Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Miller

R v Miller (case citation: [1982] UKHL 6; [1983] 2 AC 161) is an English criminal law case demonstrating how actus reus can be interpreted to be not only an act, but a failure to act.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	R v Miller (en)
rdfs:comment	R v Miller (case citation: [1982] UKHL 6; [1983] 2 AC 161) is an English criminal law case demonstrating how actus reus can be interpreted to be not only an act, but a failure to act. (en)
name	R v Miller (en)
dcterms:subject	1982 in British law 1982 in case law English criminal case law House of Lords cases
Wikipage page ID	11397616 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1082953712 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	English criminal law Birmingham House of Lords DPP v Santana-Bermudez Indecency with Children Act 1960 Lord Bridge of Harwich Mens rea BAILII Actus reus 1982 in British law Criminal Damage Act 1971 1982 in case law English criminal case law House of Lords cases Assault occasioning actual bodily harm Sparkbrook Lord Diplock Offences against the Person Act 1861 Case citation Recklessness (law) Lord Brandon of Oakbrook Lord Brightman Lord Keith of Kinkel dbr:R_v_Caldwell_(James)
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1982/6.html
sameAs	R v Miller R v Miller R v Miller
transcripts	transcript at BAILII (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Blockquote dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_Court_Case
citations	(en) [1982] UKHL 6 (en) [1983] 1 All ER 978 (en) [1983] 2 AC 161 (en)
court	House of Lords
full name	Regina v Miller (en)
judges	Lord Bridge of Harwich Lord Diplock Lord Brandon of Oakbrook Lord Brightman Lord Keith of Kinkel (en)
keywords	Omissions; Arson; Failure to act (en)
has abstract	R v Miller (case citation: [1982] UKHL 6; [1983] 2 AC 161) is an English criminal law case demonstrating how actus reus can be interpreted to be not only an act, but a failure to act. (en)
Cases cited	R v Caldwell (en)
date decided	1982-03-17 (xsd:date)
Legislation cited	Offences Against the Person Act 1861 s. 47, Criminal Appeal Act 1968 s.33, Criminal Damage Act 1971 s.1, Criminal Damage Act 1971 s.1, Criminal Damage Act 1971 s.1, Criminal Damage Act 1971 s.4, Cruelty to Animals Act 1849 s.2, Indecency with Children Act 1960 , Sexual Offences Act 1976 s.1, Theft Act 1978 , Theft Act 1968 s.15, Theft Act 1968 s.16, (en)
gold:hypernym	Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Miller?oldid=1082953712&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	4360 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Miller
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	English criminal law Omissions in English criminal law DPP v Santana-Bermudez Omission (law) Actus reus Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock R. v Miller
is Wikipage redirect of	R. v Miller
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Miller

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software