St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R was the leading case on Aboriginal title in Canada for more than 80 years. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, affirming a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada, held that Aboriginal title over land was allowed only at the Crown's pleasure, and could be taken away at any time. This case, involving Ojibway Treaty No. 3 which had never been previously litigated before any court, is a leading decision in Canada on the differences between the division of legislative powers and property rights under the Constitution of Canada.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - セント・キャサリン・ミリング対女王 (ja)
- St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R (en)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R was the leading case on Aboriginal title in Canada for more than 80 years. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, affirming a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada, held that Aboriginal title over land was allowed only at the Crown's pleasure, and could be taken away at any time. This case, involving Ojibway Treaty No. 3 which had never been previously litigated before any court, is a leading decision in Canada on the differences between the division of legislative powers and property rights under the Constitution of Canada. (en)
- セント・キャサリン・ミリング対女王（1888 14 App. Cas. 46 (J.C.P.C.)）は、カルダー判決から80年以上も前に遡る、カナダにおける ファーストネイションの先住民権をめぐって、先例となった判決である。 は、土地をめぐる先住民権はheld that aboriginal title over land was allowed only at the crown's pleasure, いついかなるときでも消去しえないとの見解を示した。 ワトソン卿は、先住民権の権原が、インディアンたちに「君主の好意により、人格権と用益権を」付与したに由来することを確認した。 (ja)
|
| name
| - St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R (en)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| citations
| - [1888] UKPC 70, 14 App Cas 46 (en)
|
| court
| |
| full name
| - St Catharines Milling and Lumber Company v The Queen (en)
|
| judges
| - Earl of Selborne, Lord Watson, Sir Arthur Hobhouse, Sir Barnes Peacock, Sir Montague E. Smith and Sir Richard Couch (en)
|
| has abstract
| - St Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v R was the leading case on Aboriginal title in Canada for more than 80 years. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, affirming a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada, held that Aboriginal title over land was allowed only at the Crown's pleasure, and could be taken away at any time. This case, involving Ojibway Treaty No. 3 which had never been previously litigated before any court, is a leading decision in Canada on the differences between the division of legislative powers and property rights under the Constitution of Canada. (en)
- セント・キャサリン・ミリング対女王（1888 14 App. Cas. 46 (J.C.P.C.)）は、カルダー判決から80年以上も前に遡る、カナダにおける ファーストネイションの先住民権をめぐって、先例となった判決である。 は、土地をめぐる先住民権はheld that aboriginal title over land was allowed only at the crown's pleasure, いついかなるときでも消去しえないとの見解を示した。 ワトソン卿は、先住民権の権原が、インディアンたちに「君主の好意により、人格権と用益権を」付与したに由来することを確認した。 (ja)
|
| appealed from
| - , affirming a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, which affirmed the judgment of the Chancery Division, restraining the defendants from cutting timber on lands in Ontario claimed to be public lands of the Province. (en)
|
| date decided
| |
| decision by
| |
| number of judges
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
| is Wikipage redirect
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)