About: Substantive due process

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Substantive due process Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Right105174653, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FSubstantive_due_process

Substantive due process is a principle in United States constitutional law that allows courts to establish and protect certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if only procedural protections are present or the rights are unenumerated elsewhere in the U.S. Constitution. Courts have asserted that such protections come from the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Substantive due process demarks the line between those acts that courts hold to be subject to government regulation or legislation and those that courts place beyond the reach of governmental interference. Whether th

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing agent yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Abstraction105854150 yago:Belief105941423 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Concept105835747 yago:Content105809192 yago:Doctrine105943300 yago:HumanRight105176846 yago:Idea105833840 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:WikicatHumanRights yago:Right105174653
rdfs:label	Substantive due process (cs) Debido proceso fundamental (es) Substantive due process (en) 实体性正当程序 (zh)
rdfs:comment	V ústavním právu Spojených států je „substantive due process“ zásada, která umožňuje soudům chránit určitá základní práva před zásahy státu, a to i v případě, že proti nim jinak existuje procesní obrana, nebo i když nejsou tato práva v Ústavě USA výslovně uvedena. Soudy vyvodily základ pro takovou ochranu z ustanovení o řádném procesu (due process clause) v pátém a čtrnáctém dodatku Ústavy, která zakazují federální vládě i vládám jednotlivých států zbavit jakoukoli osobu „života, svobody nebo majetku bez řádného soudního procesu“ („… due process of law“). Zásada „substantive due process“ vymezuje hranici mezi jednáním, které soudy považují za ještě podléhající vládním nařízením nebo legislativě, a jednáním, které už soudy umisťují mimo dosah zásahů státu. Jestli však byl pátý nebo čtrnáctý (cs) El debido proceso fundamental (en inglés: substantive due process) es una teoría del derecho estadounidense por medio de la cual los tribunales establecen límites al poder y autoridad del gobierno. Según la jurisprudencia estadounidense, el uso de los tribunales de esta teoría procede de la de las enmiendas quinta y decimocuarta, que prohíben a los gobiernos federal y estatales, respectivamente, privar a cualquier persona de la «vida, libertad o propiedad, sin el proceso debido de la ley.» Así, el proceso debido fundamental marca la línea entre, por un lado, los actos de las personas de naturaleza pública o privada que el tribunal establece que son objeto de regulación púbica o legislación, y por otro los actos que los tribunales sitúan más allá del alcance de cualquier regulación guber (es) Substantive due process is a principle in United States constitutional law that allows courts to establish and protect certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if only procedural protections are present or the rights are unenumerated elsewhere in the U.S. Constitution. Courts have asserted that such protections come from the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". Substantive due process demarks the line between those acts that courts hold to be subject to government regulation or legislation and those that courts place beyond the reach of governmental interference. Whether th (en) 實質性正當程序（substantive due process）是一項原則，在美國憲法中，是允許法院保護某些基本權利免受政府干預，即使是存在的，也沒有特別提到其他權利；實質性正當程序界定法院所持有的行為之間的界線，受政府管制或立法的約束，以及法院在政府干預範圍之外的行為。美国宪法第五修正案和第十四修正案是否有意為這一功能提供服務，仍然是學術上的問題，也是司法討論和異議的問題。實質性的正當程序應與程序正當程序區分開來。這一區別源自於“正當法律程序”一詞中的“法律”。程序性正當程序保護個人不受政府強制權力的影響，確保裁決程序在有效的法律下是公正和公正的。例如，這樣的保護包括充分和及時地通知為什麽需要在法庭或其他行政機構面前出現一個政黨，有權對事實和法律進行公正的審判，並有權在聽證會上作證和提出有關證據。相反，實質性的正當程序保護個人不受政府權力的限制：法院可能會發現，大多數的法律法規並不是法律，也不能強制執行，無論制定和執行的過程是否公平。這一術語最初在20世紀30年代被明確地用於法律案例書中，作為選定的正當程序案例的分類區分，到1952年，最高法院的意見中已經提到過兩次。“實質性正當程序”一詞通常有兩種用途：一是確定某一特定的判例法，二是在兩項正當程序條款下對司法審查的一種特定政治態度。 (zh)
differentFrom	Procedural due process
dcterms:subject	American legal terminology United States substantive due process case law Due Process Clause
Wikipage page ID	585092 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1123583017 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	BMW v. Gore Robinson v. California Rochin v. California Roe v. Wade Same-sex marriage Privileges or Immunities Clause Benjamin Robbins Curtis Bowers v. Hardwick Anti-miscegenation laws Judicial review Robert Cover United States constitutional law United States v. Carolene Products Co. Intermediate scrutiny Obergefell v. Hodges Penumbras Notice Strict scrutiny Clarence Thomas Clear and convincing evidence Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co. Equal Protection Clause Anthony Kennedy Antonin Scalia Lochner v. New York Loving v. Virginia Majoritarian Skinner v. Oklahoma Slaughter-House Cases Stephen Breyer Police power (United States constitutional law) Byron White Troxel v. Granville West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish Lochner era Unenumerated rights Abraham Lincoln Allgeyer v. Louisiana American Civil War Daniel Webster Dartmouth College v. Woodward Dred Scott v. Sandford Due process clause First Amendment to the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution Dictum Legal realism Griswold v. Connecticut Arthur Goldberg American legal terminology United States substantive due process case law John Hart Ely John Marshall Harlan II Bill of attainder Coercion Third Amendment to the United States Constitution Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Trier of fact Missouri Compromise Moore v. East Cleveland Due Process Clause Pierce v. Society of Sisters Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of contract Great Depression Meyer v. Nebraska Natural justice

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software