About: United States v. Washington

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: United States v. Washington Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FUnited_States_v._Washington

United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), commonly known as the Boldt Decision (from the name of the trial court judge, George Hugo Boldt), was a legal case in 1974 heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case re-affirmed the rights of American Indian tribes in the state of Washington to co-manage and continue to harvest salmon and other fish under the terms of various treaties with the U.S. government. The tribes ceded their land to the United States but reserved the right to fish as they always had. This included their traditional locations off the designated reservations.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	United States v. Washington (en) United States v. Washington (eo) ボルト判決 (ja)
rdfs:comment	「ボルト判決」（ボルトはんけつ、Boldt Decision）は、アメリカ合衆国で1974年に下されたワシントン州におけるインディアンの漁猟権を巡る判決であり、同州におけるサケの年間漁獲量の半分は、1850年代に合衆国連邦政府と条約を結んだインディアン諸部族にその権利があるとしたものである。 (ja) United States v. Washington (Usono kontraŭ Vaŝingtonio), neformale konata kiel la "Decido Boldt" (angle "Boldt Decision") estis jura proceso traktita en 1974 antaŭ la por la de Vaŝingtonio kaj apelacie en 1975 antaŭ la por la . Ĝi rekonfirmis la rezervitaj rajton de en la ŝtato Vaŝingtonio kunagadi flanke de la ŝtato kiel kunadministrantoj de salmoj kaj aliaj fiŝoj, kaj daŭre rikoltadi ilin laŭ la diversaj traktatoj, kiujn Usono subskribis kun la triboj. La triboj de Vaŝingtonio estis cedintaj siajn terpropraĵojn al Usono sed rezervis la rajton fiŝkaptadi kiel antaŭe, inkluzive de kaptado ĉe tradiciaj lokoj ekster la oficialaj rezervejoj. Post longa proceso, la decido de usona juĝisto asertis ke la triboj rajtas havi duonon de la ĉiujara fiŝrikoltaĵo. En 1975 la apelacia kortumo aprob (eo) United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), commonly known as the Boldt Decision (from the name of the trial court judge, George Hugo Boldt), was a legal case in 1974 heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case re-affirmed the rights of American Indian tribes in the state of Washington to co-manage and continue to harvest salmon and other fish under the terms of various treaties with the U.S. government. The tribes ceded their land to the United States but reserved the right to fish as they always had. This included their traditional locations off the designated reservations. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	1974 in United States case law 1974 in Washington (state) United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases United States Native American treaty case law United States district court cases Native American history of Washington (state) Legal history of Washington (state)
Wikipage page ID	1224878 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1088014863 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Puget Sound Quileute Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe of Washington F.2d Minutes Puyallup tribe Billy Frank Jr. Hoh Indian Tribe of the Hoh Indian Reservation Hudson's Bay Company Hunger strike John Paul Stevens Robert C. Belloni United States Coast Guard United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Due process Easement Indian agent Indian reservation Initiative Intervention (law) Lewis & Clark Law School Sohappy v. Smith Columbia River Concurrent estate Salmon Civil Rights Movement 1974 in United States case law George Hugo Boldt Gray whale 1974 in Washington (state) Equitable servitude Treaty of Neah Bay Lloyd Meeds Makah Skokomish Indian Tribe Slade Gorton Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of Washington United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases Celilo Falls Thurston County, Washington Tulee v. Washington U.S. Supreme Court Washington (state) Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n Weirs William Clark William O. Douglas United States Native American treaty case law Columbia River Drainage Basin Yakama Indian Reservation African Americans Alaska Alfred Goodwin United States district court cases Everett, Washington Federal government of the United States Native American history of Washington (state) Nisqually Indian Tribe of the Nisqually Reservation Pacific Northwest Chum salmon Quinault people Remand (court procedure) Habeas corpus Herbert Choy James M. Burns (judge) Legal history of Washington (state) Court of equity Courts of Washington (state) Rainbow trout Chinook salmon

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software