About: Fundamental justice

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Fundamental justice Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/6prVwhCR8v

In Canadian and New Zealand law, fundamental justice is the fairness underlying the administration of justice and its operation. The principles of fundamental justice are specific legal principles that command "significant societal consensus" as "fundamental to the way in which the legal system ought fairly to operate", per R v Malmo-Levine. These principles may stipulate basic procedural rights afforded to anyone facing an adjudicative process or procedure that affects fundamental rights and freedoms, and certain substantive standards related to the rule of law that regulate the actions of the state (e.g., the rule against unclear or vague laws). The degree of protection dictated by these standards and procedural rights vary in accordance with the precise context, involving a contextual a

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Fundamental justice (en) 基本公正原則 (zh)
rdfs:comment	基本公正原則（Fundamental Fairness Doctrine）是一種美國憲法上的原則，只要被法院認定是一種基本權，依據「正當法律程序」條款的要求，該項基本權即可適用至州。至於究竟權利法案的哪些內容可以適用至各州，採取的是「基本權」（Fundamental Rights）的方法，即只有那些「作為吾人一切公民暨政治制度基石的自由與正義基本原則」所默示權利，或那些「秩序井然的自由」（ordered liberty）概念所默示包括的權利，才能包含於「正當法律程序」條款之中。由於此項原則具有高度的靈活與不確定性，因此受到批評。black大法官於Duncan v. Louisiana（1968）的協同意見書表示，設若採取「基本公正原則」，將會使得正當法律程序條款的內容，取決於部分法官的倫理以及道德觀念，而不受憲法明文的限制。於過去的歷史中，並未表示正當法律程序條款的憲法上控制，並須依靠法官的價值觀。因此，20世紀60年代以後，法院逐漸往「合併原則」，尤其是「」邁進。 (zh) In Canadian and New Zealand law, fundamental justice is the fairness underlying the administration of justice and its operation. The principles of fundamental justice are specific legal principles that command "significant societal consensus" as "fundamental to the way in which the legal system ought fairly to operate", per R v Malmo-Levine. These principles may stipulate basic procedural rights afforded to anyone facing an adjudicative process or procedure that affects fundamental rights and freedoms, and certain substantive standards related to the rule of law that regulate the actions of the state (e.g., the rule against unclear or vague laws). The degree of protection dictated by these standards and procedural rights vary in accordance with the precise context, involving a contextual a (en)
dct:subject	Law of New Zealand Legal terminology Law of Canada
Wikipage page ID	221724 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1078582214 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Peter Hogg United States Due process Liberty Constitution of Canada Equity (law) Law of New Zealand Lochner era Section Seven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Administration of justice Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education) Right to life Rule of law Jean Beetz Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) Legal terminology Law of Canada John Diefenbaker Supreme Court of Canada Duke v. The Queen Natural justice Canadian Bill of Rights Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Refugee New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Section Twenty-six of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act Section Twenty-four of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Walter Tarnopolsky Section Twenty-three of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Canadian law Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration R v Malmo-Levine Security of the person Wednesbury unreasonableness dbr:Human_Rights_Code_(Canadian_federal_law) dbr:MacBain_v._Lederman
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://web.archive.org/web/20080511073756/http:/www.eqrolc.ca/eqen.shtml https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v26y1997i6p627-643.html http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1985/1985scc72.html
sameAs	Fundamental justice Fundamental justice Fundamental justice Fundamental justice
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Main_article dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Administrative_law
has abstract	In Canadian and New Zealand law, fundamental justice is the fairness underlying the administration of justice and its operation. The principles of fundamental justice are specific legal principles that command "significant societal consensus" as "fundamental to the way in which the legal system ought fairly to operate", per R v Malmo-Levine. These principles may stipulate basic procedural rights afforded to anyone facing an adjudicative process or procedure that affects fundamental rights and freedoms, and certain substantive standards related to the rule of law that regulate the actions of the state (e.g., the rule against unclear or vague laws). The degree of protection dictated by these standards and procedural rights vary in accordance with the precise context, involving a contextual analysis of the affected person's interests. In other words, the more a person's rights or interests are adversely affected, the more procedural or substantive protections must be afforded to that person in order to respect the principles of fundamental justice. A legislative or administrative framework that respects the principles of fundamental justice, as such, must be fundamentally fair to the person affected, but does not necessarily have to strike the "right balance" between individual and societal interests in general. The term is used in the Canadian Bill of Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and also the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Fundamental justice, although closely associated with, is not to be confused with the concepts of due process, natural justice, and Wednesbury unreasonableness. (en) 基本公正原則（Fundamental Fairness Doctrine）是一種美國憲法上的原則，只要被法院認定是一種基本權，依據「正當法律程序」條款的要求，該項基本權即可適用至州。至於究竟權利法案的哪些內容可以適用至各州，採取的是「基本權」（Fundamental Rights）的方法，即只有那些「作為吾人一切公民暨政治制度基石的自由與正義基本原則」所默示權利，或那些「秩序井然的自由」（ordered liberty）概念所默示包括的權利，才能包含於「正當法律程序」條款之中。由於此項原則具有高度的靈活與不確定性，因此受到批評。black大法官於Duncan v. Louisiana（1968）的協同意見書表示，設若採取「基本公正原則」，將會使得正當法律程序條款的內容，取決於部分法官的倫理以及道德觀念，而不受憲法明文的限制。於過去的歷史中，並未表示正當法律程序條款的憲法上控制，並須依靠法官的價值觀。因此，20世紀60年代以後，法院逐漸往「合併原則」，尤其是「」邁進。 (zh)
gold:hypernym	Fairness
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Fundamental_justice?oldid=1078582214&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	11456 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Fundamental_justice
is rdfs:seeAlso of	Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Canada (AG) v PHS Community Services Society Beauregard v Canada Procedural justice Death row phenomenon Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia (Minister of Education) Due process Duke v R Index of law articles Inquisitorial system Preamble to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms R v Morales R v Clay R v Daviault R v Jones R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine R v Morgentaler R v Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society R v Stevens R v Vaillancourt Mommy (2014 film) Fundamental Justice Administrative law Procedural law Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp Adversarial system Blencoe v British Columbia (Human Rights Commission) Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court Audi alteram partem Natural justice Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v Chiarelli Canada v Schmidt Canadian Bill of Rights Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG) New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 68 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software