About: Question of law

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Question of law Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Work, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FQuestion_of_law

In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well as inferences arising from those facts. Answers to questions of law are generally expressed in terms of broad legal principles and can be applied to many situations rather than be dependent on particular circumstances or factual situations. An answer to a question of law as applied to the particular facts of a case is often referred to as a conclusion of law.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	work
rdfs:label	Question of law (en) Rättsfråga (sv)
rdfs:comment	Rättsfråga är det rättsliga bedömandet av den framlagda fakta. Man skiljer inom juridiken på rättsfrågan och (även kallad sakfrågan). Medan man med bevisfrågan menar frågan om vad i målet är att anse för sant, avses med rättsfrågan , det vill säga frågan om hur fakta ska bedömas ur rättslig synvinkel. Frågan om person A har slagit person B är en bevisfråga, och frågor om vilken lagbestämmelse som kan tillämpas och vilken påföljden kan bli är en rättsfråga. (sv) In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well as inferences arising from those facts. Answers to questions of law are generally expressed in terms of broad legal principles and can be applied to many situations rather than be dependent on particular circumstances or factual situations. An answer to a question of law as applied to the particular facts of a case is often referred to as a conclusion of law. (en)
dcterms:subject	Evidence law Philosophy of law
Wikipage page ID	3840399 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1115562559 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Benelux Court of Justice Problem of induction Deference Epistemology Appellate court Common law Demarcation problem Evidence law Jurisdiction Jury A priori and a posteriori Analytic–synthetic distinction European Court of Justice Evidence (law) Falsifiability Judge Legal burden of proof Is–ought problem Philosophy of law Law Trier of fact Lord Advocate's Reference Fact–value distinction Case brief
sameAs	Question of law Question of law Question of law Question of law Question of law Question of law Question of law
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cn dbt:Portal_bar dbt:Reflist dbt:Section_link dbt:Short_description dbt:Jurisprudence
has abstract	In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well as inferences arising from those facts. Answers to questions of law are generally expressed in terms of broad legal principles and can be applied to many situations rather than be dependent on particular circumstances or factual situations. An answer to a question of law as applied to the particular facts of a case is often referred to as a conclusion of law. In several civil law jurisdictions, the highest courts deem questions of fact as having been settled by the lower courts and will only consider questions of law. They thus may refer a case back to a lower court to re-apply the law and answer any fact-based evaluations based on their answer on the application of the law. International courts such as the Benelux Court of Justice and the European Court of Justice will only answer questions of law, asked by judges of national courts if they are not certain about the interpretation of the law of multilateral organizations. Questions of law are resolved by a judge or equivalent, while questions of fact are resolved by a trier of fact, which in the common law system is often a jury. Conclusions of law are more readily reconsidered by an appellate court, whereas findings of fact in a common law legal system are rarely overturned. (en) Rättsfråga är det rättsliga bedömandet av den framlagda fakta. Man skiljer inom juridiken på rättsfrågan och (även kallad sakfrågan). Medan man med bevisfrågan menar frågan om vad i målet är att anse för sant, avses med rättsfrågan , det vill säga frågan om hur fakta ska bedömas ur rättslig synvinkel. Frågan om person A har slagit person B är en bevisfråga, och frågor om vilken lagbestämmelse som kan tillämpas och vilken påföljden kan bli är en rättsfråga. (sv)
gold:hypernym	Question
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Question_of_law?oldid=1115562559&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	6532 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Question_of_law
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Amount in controversy Question of fact Scottish Land Court Fact (law) Baseball Rule Hollingsworth v. Perry Judiciary of France Judiciary of Russia Relinquishment of United States nationality United States administrative law United States v. Microsoft Corp. United States v. Morgan (1954) Index of law articles Unconscionability Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 Constitution of the United States Coram nobis Court of Appeal of Singapore Court of Cassation (Belgium) Court of Session Courts of Scotland Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Labour standards in the World Trade Organization Supreme Court of Cameroon Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC Legal fiction Legal recognition Liberalism in the Netherlands Lord President of the Court of Session Common law Labor court Private defense agency COVIDSafe Administrative law in Singapore William Erle Habitual residence Jury Justice of the peace (Belgium) Law of South Korea DPP v Ziegler Ouster clause Judiciary of Belgium Judiciary of Vermont Legitimate expectation Conclusion of fact Conclusion of law Finding of fact Misrepresentation

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software